this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
489 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30493 readers
1980 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“No one, whether you’re trans or not, wants the federal government digging through your identifiable patient information and figuring out what they like and don’t like,” Hack said. “It’s an absolute overreach, and people are really scared.”

Asked whether Hack’s priorities were measures he could support, Platner agreed. “Yes, indeed. They most certainly do,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 101 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Platner can be divisive

Only to those with either thin skin, a sense of entitlement about what kinds of people should be allowed access to political power, or who don't have a coherent theory of change.

Look. I'm a veteran. I drank that kool-aid and won the poverty draft lotto. I literally signed up for tacos. Understanding the imperialist machine from the inside changes you. And veterans have been representative in the fight against fascism in the US the whole time. And I've worked with every one in those links. Many of them were raised as conservative assholes. And for some of them it took their buddy getting blown up in the humvee next to them to wake up to the consequences of imperialism. And you should have the grace to allow people to change.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago
[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hah, joke's on me. I threw that in to head off the complaining from his haters, so we could focus on the good things he's doing. Can't please everybody, I guess.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean your not wrong to have included it. But so much of the reaction is from a place of cynicism and bad faith. I think everyones hackles are raised, and legitimately so, around characters like Sinema and Fetterman. But what Planter is doing is clearly different and has been different since they started. I got to meet them when one of my volunteer groups were trying to make the decision around endorsing him. This was back in September & October.

And there has been a lot which has happened between August and now. Anything that can happened in this race basically did. If they had more powder to set off, they needed to set it off weeks ago, because at this pace Platner is looking to schelack Collins.

Its time to coalesce as a party. Schumer and Jefferies just threw the best two years we had to fight fascism to a pit and lit it on fire. But now, now Woke is back baby!, and Woke 2 gonna make your head spin. We need to see Platner, Mandami, Al Sayed (inshalah), Chris Rabb, All three of Mamdani's endorsees on one stage. Schumer and Jefferies spoiled our ability to present a coherent front of resistance against fascism. That changes in November.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

I believe in redemption and I think everyone should. We all grow as people, that should be celebrated.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I think that it is okay to be entitled to wanting better representation than him. He's definitely not perfect, not by a long shot, and there are certainly warning signs about him. You're right in that people change. They can be better. He may very well be much better than he was, and he definitely looks like he is so far. But, his changing for the better doesn't have to put him in a position of power, either. Because it is also entitlement that he wants to be Senator with the type of baggage he has. But, I can't say there is currently a better candidate than him right now.

That's the way I see it, anyway. I will hope he continues to be a progressive force, and that my doubts are unfounded!

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't believe he didn't know what the tattoo was but he gets the benefit of the doubt as long as he keeps putting his money where his mouth is.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was drunk as fuck on habu saki, 18 years old, in Okinawa one night on shore, in line with four other sailors to get tattoos. I dont remember what happened after that.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Did you proceed to have an obvious nazi tattoo on your chest for a decade and change? Because that's a big blind spot and a bad look. Like, he's better than Collins and he's saying the right stuff, but I won't trust him until he's proven himself. You don't get a nazi tattoo for years and years and not deserve a lot of extra scrutiny. He's got a lot of work to do.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Dude it's not an obvious Nazi tattoo when 9 out 10 of the people here couldn't pick the fucking tattoo out of a lineup.

You're being wildly ridiculous.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The people here aren't observant. It's literally the goddamn emblem on the SS cap. If you've seen a movie featuring nazis ever, you've seen the totenkopf. What's wildly ridiculous is every goddamn body making excuses for a fucking Nazi capital N Nazi tattoo. I keep saying he's certainly better than Collins because the bar is in fuckin hell but none of you fuckin people actually read that part, you're all too busy defending a fuckin nazi tattoo. Our options here are that he's oblivious enough to have a nazi tattoo on his chest for twenty fucking years, or he's obviously fucking lying about not knowing it was a nazi tattoo and never cared to do anything about it until it got public. These are shit options, but yeah, still better than Collins. Stop fuckin making excuses for Nazi tattoos, like fuckin hell I know lemmings love fascism but christ but maybe not make excuses for the fuckin poster child. Congratulations, now you also have comments defending nazi tattoos. This is why Americans fucking deserve the government we have. We ask for it, because apparently holding someone to account for a fucking Nazi tattoo is too much for you fucking people. I'd have a lot more respect for the fucker if he just admitted he was a dumb fucking kid that didn't think it was a big deal instead of lying about knowing what it was.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I honestly could see him not knowing, especially if the other fascist fucks he was hanging out with were getting the same ink.

But that's a "makes bad decisions" discussion rather than a "maybe it's not as Nazi as you think" discussion.

It's totally, 110% Nazi. The only remaining question is "did it represent his views then, and does it represent his views now?"

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you proceed to have an obvious nazi tattoo on your chest for a decade and change?

Nope. Just woke up on the sub with a shiner and a bank account that had been completely drained, neither of which I had an explanation for.

Because that’s a big blind spot and a bad look. Like, he’s better than Collins and he’s saying the right stuff, but I won’t trust him until he’s proven himself. You don’t get a nazi tattoo for years and years and not deserve a lot of extra scrutiny. He’s got a lot of work to do.

Yeah and this is the point I made about giving people space to have changed. Mainers have had that kind of grace, and if you believe in grass-roots democracy, you should trust them at this point. And its funny because I make the point, people seem to nod their heads along, and then always, there is some chirper who wants to pipe in and say "not good enough". And its really a catastrophic sickness in the current leftist populist moment in the US, which we can easily contrast with the rightwing populist moment (both started at the same time).

The rightwing movement has been inclusive, and the leftwing movement has been exclusive; and because of that difference in ideology, the rightwing movement took over for the previous 10 years and enacted their agenda: fascism. And you (and others) are doing it right here. Your trying to find a way to exclude someone from the movement. Rightwing populism has been doing the opposite. When they identify someone who could be an ally, they find a way to make a seat for them at the table. Its a horrible, fascist, disgusting table, but its been able to grow its membership because they'll take all comers and speak to how their movement will address their grievances.

The entire point being made is that the very thing you are doing is a self-destructive, reactionary tendency which has knee-capped our ability to grow a leftist populism which can confront fascism. And I wont' deny there are other factors to surmount in this regard, but this self-sabotaging instinct is fundamental to why things have been so difficult. Thankfully though, as the movement has grown, this voice of yours which is typically online, and very disconnected from lived experience, its volume becomes lost in the crowd.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The very thing I'm doing is not implicitly trusting a man that claims he didn't realize he had a nazi tattoo on his chest for twenty years. A nazi tattoo that he says he got in Croatia and it's a fair assumption that wasn't the only displayed nazi iconography there. And everyone who's seen him shirtless for twenty years to also not have any idea. Like, I'd rather he just admit to having known what it was because otherwise he and his circle have a significant amount of ignorance that's especially relevant when actual nazis are getting elected. I'm not being unreasonable or self destructive here. Until he proves with significant action otherwise, I'm going to assume he's the kinda guy that would get a nazi tattoo, because he did. Army bullshit is still a bullshit excuse. I'm giving him all the grace he deserves, which is enough for him to win the primary innit? But talk is cheap from anyone, especially someone who had a death's head on their tit for twenty years and still claims to not know what it was. So when he gets elected and starts backing up his words, he'll get the credit that's absolutely due. Sure people can change, but the burden of proof to show with actions consistently that they have changed is on them.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thankfully though, as the movement has grown, this voice of yours which is typically online, and very disconnected from lived experience, its volume becomes lost in the crowd.