this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
1401 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11723 readers
2342 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Its not one or the other, that's overly simplistic. Using this one data point to "prove" climate change is about as honest as someone bringing a snowball into congress to prove it's fake.

You need both to prove a sustainable point, otherwise it's forgotten with the next cold snap. This is one extreme data point, and it helps to showcase the problem, but it is not the only one. Use it as part of a whole, not as a singular showcase.

Thats my interpretation of OPs comment.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Idk when record-breaking high temperatures are showing up weekly I think they stop being "extreme" data points

Outliers aren't outliers anymore when all the measurements are in that range

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That they're outliers of what has been the norm for centuries is the entire point. Saying "this is the new normal" is, as you might surmise, normalizing it.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it is the new normal? None of us (hopefully) want it to be, but it's the reality we have to deal with, unless the laws of physics that make thermometers work suddenly changed and no one noticed

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

It looks like you both basically agree

[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

If you have many outliers in rather small interval they stop being outliers and indicate a trend.

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I get what you’re saying. And you’re right. It about “how often”

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Lemmy users falling for the same logical fallacies they laugh at others for using challenge: impossible.

A single datapoint doesn't prove anything, but a pattern of change that can be proven to be influenced separately from typical weather variation does. Like it or not, it would also have to be proven that the pattern is being caused by something distinct from global climate patterns.

For the record, I firmly believe climate change is real, I just hate when people I agree with try using the same dumb arguments as the people I disagree with.