this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
345 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

60253 readers
531 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
345
[META] Should AI disclosure tags [AI], [NOT AI] be mandated when sharing projects? (aussie.zone)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
155 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

@curbstickle@anarchist.nexus - as per your suggestion, here is the AI tags discussion, which I imagine you've been eyeballing.

I don't know where this leaves the community, nor how many responders are part of the community vs lookie loos. I would have put up a staw poll but that likely wouldn't have helped much, signal:noise wise.

As the mod, do you have a read on all this or a preferred direction going forward?

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As I already mentioned, I won't be putting anything up for the week as the other rule gets closed out to not inundate, so do not expect any action this week.

That said, it absutely confirmed my expectations, and I'll be looking into some automod options and discussing with the .world team to find out if there are any known issues with them, so that a few options can be presented in the next sticky.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So state of play / preview of coming attractions - yes to tags, once tagged, cannot complain about said tagged content. Formal sticky etc next week.

PS: I took a look at r/selfhosted - their bot seems to delete ALL new project posts and requires user to appeal / resubmit / verify directly. I think that's problematic (and ironic, if you think about it - you're trying to litigate ai/no ai with a bot) but not my circus, not my monkeys.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah that's not a method I'm interested in. A comment for OP to post under? Yep.

We'll see what works for folks next week.