this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
230 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

85695 readers
4159 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 134 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I don’t want a tool to avoid Flock cameras. I want a tool that uses my Bluetooth to turn Flock cameras into bricks.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 hours ago

One of those spray-can extension poles would probably work pretty well.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Craftsman CMCG451

[–] TheDeadInternet@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Portable angle grinder.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Need to figure out a small scale, cheap, EMP device that can be set off to fry the cameras and sensors, but nothing else that is around.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

I heard that certain laser pointers of a specific wavelength can cook most cameras.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "Nothing else around" is the hard part of that.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Agreed, though I would expect one to not be carrying anything that could be affected by such a device, whilst deploying said devices. So personal devices don't count as needing protection AFAIC

[–] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

If it's using Bluetooth to knacker them, then all the nearby Bluetooth devices would be vulnerable.

Medical equipment these days also can feature Bluetooth for mobile connectivity, and you can't exactly go without your defibrillator, hearing aids, or insulin pump.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

maybe some kinda really directional antenna? like a laser but for the radio range of EM

need to have line of sight and accurate aim, however

[–] punkcoder@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny enough, bricks do that.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

TIL bricks can assimilate other bricks like the Borg.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you want a tool that turns Flock cameras into bricks, all you need is a brick.

... Or wire cutters, or a big hammer, or an angle grinder, or a drill, or a large rock, or a can of spray paint, etc, etc, etc. They're not terribly resilient against physical damage.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been thinking of buying a slingshot and some paintballs. For another, completely irrelevant purpose though, obviously.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Remember to mask up when you're going out playing with paintballs -- for covid safety! Wear sunglasses, too -- you don't want eye damage from the bright sunlight.

Oh, and perhaps most importantly, leave your phone at home. Wouldn't want to accidentally hit your phone with a paintball, would you?

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

problem is the camera sees you offing it. unless you bloc up way away, and not near your own stuff.

[–] wildflower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would think that a simple laser-pointer pointed at the camera would be enough to damage the sensor?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Lasers would be quite risky. Anything that powerful would also instantly obliterate peoples' vision if there's a reflection and it gets them in the eye.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You'll need around a 1-watt green (532nm) laser pointer. That's gonna run you about $500 and they're kinda dangerous.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

$60 for a hobbyist who can hook up a module.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

True, but like I said, kinda dangerous. I like my eyes.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago

Best to wear laser goggles for sure.