this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
79 points (97.6% liked)

United Kingdom

6750 readers
333 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing to do with interpretation. Their base pay isn't low (even as a ratio). You've not offered any evidence about the wage to bonus ratio (lack of evidence being your original gripe) You're either willfully ideologically ignorant or disingenuous. I would guess from seeing other posts that it's the latter.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

10% of your wage being base pay is absolutely a low percentage. Example: https://www.ipcconsultants.com/blog/global-ceo-compensation-trends

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Can you explain how that works for the least paid water CEO who earns £440k + bonus? Or the highest paid who receives £3.3 million + bonus?

I think I understand that you're making some sort of abstract, generalised point about CEO pay - but can you explain how that applies here to the pay of water fat cats?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

This applies here due to the phrasing of the headline - the headline implies that the CEO got rewarded for doing a bad job based on being paid a "big" bonus. But their pay structure is structured in a way where this is a usual and expected part of their pay.

This isn't really about what water company CEOs are paid but journalists using CEO pay structure for an outrage inducing headline.