this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)
Music
11720 readers
48 users here now
Per community feedback, low-effort GenAI posts are disallowed.
↳ Our family Communities:
➰#Music
Music.world - !music@lemmy.world
Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world
Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world
Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee
Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee
Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world
Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com
60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world
70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world
80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world
90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As I said the quality of the master is the most important. I have a CD from 1985, the SACD, and an original Stereo LP. I can't decide if I prefer the early CD press or the original LP. Both are similar in dynamics. I haven't heard a remaster of it I liked. Most modern remasters suck imo.
Edit: If you want to hear digital audio at it's best get yourself an original CD copy of Dire Straits Brothers in Arms. One of the best sounding and most dynamic recordings i've ever heard. It destroys the LP.