politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Well, Donvict was clearly worked up over Obama Presidenting While Black - it was obvious from all his stupid racist birther bullshit.
Sure, he wasn't the only one (anyone remember Orly Taitz, LOL?) but he quickly became the spearhead for the racists that were so GRRRR MAD that a black man was their President and tried to make their white hot racist rage all about long form birth certificates. It seriously broke the brains of the Republican Party/conservatives to have Obama as their President. I mean, they were already bad before, but after Obama, they only got worse. When conservatives blame Obama for their turn to someone as shitty as Donvict as their option, they are not exactly wrong, but they are not really understanding that they are telling on themselves.
Someone as disgusting and gross and racist like Donvict was almost bound to happen as a result of having a black President. Also, after the China White of someone like Palin, they were not going to settle for the methadone of Jeb! or Romney.
They wanted someone that would tell them to be their worst selves and be proud of it, because this country was "taken" from them and they need to "take it back". They viewed equality as oppression. They wanted someone that was the manifestation of Faux News, and Donvict is exactly that.
Yeah, whatever happened to Oily Taint? See seems to have gone silent around 2012 after her stellar career as a record-breaking vexatious litigant.
I see from her Wikipedia page that she expressed interest in joining Donvict's legal team in 2020 over his lost election, LOL.
This is a great analysis, but its very biased on recent events. There are groups working towards all of this since the civil rights movement. Trump happened to be the right person at the right time, but the plan had been in motion for decades before he came down that escalator. A lot of this started with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich and the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_for_National_Policy.
Oh, you'll get no argument here. I used to call the teabaggers the teabirchers since most of their ideas (and probably many of the members, too) were retreads from the John Birch Society.
I've also read some things in recent years that wrote about how what really turbocharged the right wing was not so much abortion (or at least abortion alone), but the fact that white flight schools that people were sending their kids to were coming under fire from the IRS, and that really lit a fire under the ass of sending them into action and to the polls, as well as forging an alliance with xtians. That was the 1970s - another big instance of this kind of thing, probably leading to Reagan and his radical agenda sweeping Washington.
I should say that Obama is one of the more visible and recent instances of this, and the backlash (in the form of Donnie) was probably all-too-predictable.
If you'd like to go down a rabit hole, checknout https://www.badfaithdocumentary.com/
It ties the CNP, the church, abortion, trump, the heritage foundation and few other threads together. It very lightly touches on the koch network, but that's another big source of recent ailments.
Thanks for rec; turns out I've already seen it. :)
I love rabbit holes, though, so if you have any more, throw them my way.
its a little older, and more effort, but Dark Money by Jane Mayer also gives some good explanation of how we got here.
Ah, the book. At first I was looking at the movie.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6633182/
Great analysis