this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
250 points (98.4% liked)

World News

56611 readers
2018 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah I haven't bought this argument since day one of the whole thing. Trump didn't go to war to distract from Epstein or ICE, at least not as directly as you make it.

Pre-war polling saw that Trump's popularity was pretty much unchanged with likely R voters even through last summer, the December vote, and Bondi's firing. He's made it very clear he doesn't feel like he needs to win over new supporters, either, and with both houses still R at least through November, there wasn't much reason for him to care about Epstein. It was already out of the news and voters were buying the Bondi-scapegoat story.

The idea that Trump was actually super upset that people were mad about ICE and wanted a distraction is just funny. The show of force, shock, confusion, and coverage was the point, Stephen Miller said as much from day 1, and to reiterate: Trump wasn't losing any R votes over these policies.

Right wing media had both of these under control with a good spin on them. There was literally no reason to do something so obviously doomed and tank the one thing every American (apparently) cares about, gas prices, to distract from either of these stories that were already on their way out.

Trump started a war with Iran because 1) it's the thing Israel has been begging anyone to back them up on for fifty years and 2) he felt bullet proof (militarily and petrologically) after Venezuela.

/rant. I had a much better version of this typed up and then refreshed the page and lost it all :-)

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago

And don't forget, crippling middle east oil exports made a lot of US oil companies a LOT of money.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

i think some of it was to gauge how far the R is willing to still support him, and to distract. the MSM were reporting anything and everything from trump, including his gaffes thats why.