this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
363 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30141 readers
2065 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It would be hilarious if it wasn't wasting 14.2 million dollars on a no bid contract that we all knew was going to fail since it was, just like everything Trump, surface level.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 93 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I appreciate the fact they didn’t measure how much they need, they just went to the pool store and bought a bunch of residential sized containers.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)

well, they fired anyone that would have given a damn, or would know the chemistry and calculations. so what they gonna do? it's not like this administration knows how to choose or hire knowledgeable, experienced, competent, and qualified persons. why didn't they just hire another 'pool boy' to 'fix' it at a cost of $50 million for the 'rush' job? (less, of course, whatever gets kicked back under the potty chair).

[–] YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I could have done the job for a measly $9m. The problem is getting the rarer american anniversary chlorine, but I'll eat the cost. Like I said, I'll do it for the low low price of $20m.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago

You're not understanding. YOU don't get that money, Trump does. You get just enough to do the bare minimum, and he'll probably stiff you on that.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Art of the Deal

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Oh my god it’s so much worse than I thought.

They’re using 1/3 the effective concentration of hydrogen peroxide and pouring it in with regular sized bottles. You need 35% and they’re using 12%.

This Reddit (spits on ground) thread has someone who did the math

https://www.reddit.com/r/theydidthemath/comments/1u7dgv5/request_how_many_gallons_of_hydrogen_peroxide_do/

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

What's another couple of thousands on retail products when you've already wasted 14.2 million.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

...and then charged the Federal government another $100k.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago

.. and placed a stunningly accurate bet on Polymarket about the size of the contract

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

To cover $1000 worth of materials. The rest went to...the Uber ride

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Does this work like not using enough antibiotics and it will actually make the algae stronger?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t think algae can evolve bleach resistance.

Bleach basically tears apart the molecules inside the cells and destroys the proteins they need to function. Antibiotics usually exploit some specific weakness in bacteria to kill them, which can be evolved around.

If you don’t use bleach enough it’ll kill the outer layers like a film and leave harder to treat algae to dominate, but the algae can’t overcome the effects of bleach. Chlorine is smaller than cellular molecules, so it’ll always permeate.

At that point they’ll need to physically scrub the whole thing or massively increase the concentration to shock it.

Source: had a pool as a kid, when we would go on vacation we’d come back to it being green. The basic chlorine wouldn’t cut it and we’d need to buy pool shock, which was just more concentrated chlorine to kill the floating stuff, then we’d have to scrub and vacuum the algae from the surfaces.

Edit: I just checked Wikipedia, they’re using 12% hydrogen peroxide. Apparently that breaks down quickly in the sun though, so it’s unlikely to do anything for the majority of the algae.

According to pool websites you need a 35% concentration, so this is going to do nothing at all at this concentration.

So basically, an actual treatment would need literal tons of peroxide applied repeatedly. The dinky bottles they’re pouring in by hand won’t do shit.

It also is known to form a film, so it won’t kill algae without scrubbing, which they’re using army rangers to do... but even though they’re scrubbing it’s still not enough concentration to kill algae and bacteria.

It’s an either make work program or complete incompetence by a pool company that’s only worked on pools with pumps and filters. Or both.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

Funny thing is, the reflecting pool has pumps and filters, they're just in disrepair (along with a bunch of other infrastructure-level stuff). Instead of actually addressing the root cause of the issue, Trump decided to give it the ol landlord special and slap a coat of paint on it.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s probably going to mess with the Ph and damage the pool pumps and etch the brand new “millions” of dollars of paint.

Too much %HOCl, and you make the water too acidic and hurt pumps and metal in the system.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apparently they’re using peroxide not chlorine

But peroxide breaks down in water and sun, so they’ll need a lot of it.

Apparently they added a bubbler, but who knows if that’ll work.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Chlorine also is degraded by UV, which is why pools usually maintain some level of CYA which acts as a stabilizer to a certain degree. CYA is naturally present in granulated chlorine (dichlor) but not in liquid chlorine (bleach), which is why the "dichlor to bleach" method starts with dichlor for a while to built a reserve of CYA, before switching to bleach. Too much CYA decreases the effectiveness of chlorine, so keeping it around 30 ppm is optimal.

Writing this got me wondering what the fine folks at TroubleFreePool think about this whole debacle... https://www.troublefreepool.com/threads/lincoln-memorial-reflecting-pool.325291/

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Fill it full of mercury. That’s total reflective and there’s no intelligence in DC for the fumes to damage

Lol

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Pfft, you'd probably measure it in metric, you COMMIE.