this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
3 points (66.7% liked)

Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence

4739 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence!

We are a community dedicated to forwarding the availability and access to:

Free Open Source Artificial Intelligence (F.O.S.A.I.)

More AI Communities

LLM Leaderboards

Developer Resources

GitHub Projects

FOSAI Time Capsule

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Folks,

I’m setting up Hermes Agent on my Mac with Ollama hosting a local model. But I’m on the fence on whether I should go with Hermes or OpenClaw. Hermes makes some pretty bold claims about “growing with you” and “self improvement”.

Anyone have any insight into whether it’s as good as promised?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The harness helps a lot even with local models. In fact, I just found this this morning and cherrypicked it: https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail

Recommend doing the same, and for superpowers if you don't have 'em already: https://github.com/obra/superpowers

Opencode Go is the $10/month cloud model subscription from the same group maintaining the OpenCode software. Opencode Zen is a pay-as-you-go version which gives you access to Claude models as well. Keeping pay-as-you-go to subagents only (e.g. telling your agent to launch an opus subagent via your opencode zen key) is actually surprisingly economical - when you're not going turn after turn with hundreds of thousands of tokens of context, claude is pretty reasonably priced.

What I'm doing is spreading out my usage over multiple cheap subscriptions, and augmenting with the occasional pay-as-you-go frontier agent, to get quality in line with what you get out of Claude, at usage that would require the $200/month level, for a lot less money than that.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m a little surprised to hear you say PAYG for Opus sub agents is economical. Maybe the superpowers and ponytail really do have a massive impact on things. I’ll send these to three people I know building heavy production apps right now. And integrate them into my own Hermes setup.

Thank you for the recommendations!

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Any time, I hope they're helpful! (☞゚ヮ゚)☞

I’m a little surprised to hear you say PAYG for Opus sub agents is economical

I did say it was surprising! 😂 To give you an idea what I mean by "economical", it's never more than a few bucks a day, even on days of heavy use and development with "loop until clean" instructions on QA (for which I use Opus). I accidentally blew through my opencode go quota really early in the first month, so I ended up on PAYG; here's the usage graph: image

And here's the numbers breakdown for the highest day (I was evaluating GLM5.1 for general tasks - don't use it for that, it's really token hungry)
image

That includes a lot of experimentation too while I figured out which models were best for what. I hid Fable because it crushed the rest of the table - really expensive, but worth it for one-shotting very long tasks on the Anthropic subscription is what I found.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Damn those are good numbers!