this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
518 points (96.4% liked)

me_irl

7911 readers
2525 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dantel@programming.dev 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The image accurately depicts what would happen to 98% of all people: lying dead by the river, starved or killed or died by disease.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago

When I saw the pic all I could think of was the horrendous amount of ticks that person may now be hosting.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've never heard of this rampant deadly disease that targets the unemployed.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Go work in an ER. The homeless are super susceptible to all kinds of diseases.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I doubt that in a society of abundance and equality, everyone would choose to live homeless.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool, soooo if we're all no longer working, then who's taking care of food production? Shelter? Medical care? Defense? Maintenance? Etc.

There is a happy medium.... everyone not having jobs is not it. A lot of jobs are hard work but benefit society heavily.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Think of it like a Star Trek esque utopia. A lot of people have jobs, but only to further themselves and grow as people. Noone has to take a job which takes all of their waking moments just so they don't die if starvation.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago

Yea and star trek has replicators...let me know when those are available.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where does the abundance come from if nobody is working?

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ok here's my pitch: murder the top 5 billionaires and liquidate their assets. That's 2.5 trillion. Everyone on earth gets like 300 bucks. Keep doing that until it evens out a bit. Also grow a vegetable garden.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Money's worth comes from the ability to buy someon else's work with it. If no one is working money is worthless.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Good, buy someone else's work by trading for it with some of your own.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

when no one works, this person will not have blue jeans, shoes, socks, shampoo, toothbrush, underwear, shirt, soap, domicile, clean hygienic food, sanitary conditions, assisted travel... electricity for their internet points - just for starters.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, when noone is forced into wage slavery, everyone will just waste away and do and produce nothing. That's why we all died out before humanity discovered various forms of servitude.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You seem to use 'slavery' and 'employment' as interchangeable. These are separate concepts.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago

No, they are not. Not in most countries.

‘Enslave me?’ you wonder. ‘Why, I am a free citizen!’

Are you free, really? Free to do what? To live as you please? To do what you please?

Let’s see. How do you live? What does your freedom amount to?

You depend on your employer for your wages or your salary, don’t you? And your wages determine your way of living, don’t they? The conditions of your life, even what you eat and drink, where you go and with whom you associate, — all of it depends on your wages.

No, you are not a free man. You are dependent on your employer and on your wages. You are really a wage slave.

The whole working class, under the capitalist system, is dependent on the capitalist class. The workers are wage slaves.

So, what becomes of your freedom? What can you do with it? Can you do more with it than your wages permit?

Can’t you see that your wage — your salary or income — is all the freedom that you have? Your freedom, your liberty, don’t go a step further than the wages you get.

The freedom that is given you on paper, that is written down in law books and constitutions, does not do you a bit of good. Such freedom only means that you have the right to do a certain thing. But it doesn’t mean that you can do it. To be able to do it, you must have the chance, the opportunity. You have a right to eat three fine meals a day, but if you haven’t the means, the opportunity to get those meals, then what good is that right to you?

So freedom really means opportunity to satisfy your needs and wants. If your freedom does not give you that opportunity, than it does you no good. Real freedom means opportunity and well-being. If it does not mean that, it means nothing.

You see, then, that the whole situation comes to this:

Capitalism robs you and makes a wage slave of you.

The law upholds and protects that robbery.

The government fools you into believing that you are independent and free.

In this way you are fooled and duped every day of your life.

But how does it happen that you didn’t think of it before? How is it that most other people don’t see it, either?

It is because you and every one else are lied to about this all the time, from your earliest childhood.

You are told to be honest, while you are being robbed all your life.

You are commanded to respect the law, while the law protects the capitalist who is robbing you.

You are taught that killing is wrong, while the government hangs and electrocutes people and slaughters them in war.

You are told to obey the law and government, though law and government stand for robbery and murder.

Thus all through life you are lied to, fooled, and deceived, so that it will be easier to make profits out of you, to exploit you.

from Now and After by Alexander Berkman, Chapter 3: Law and Government. Available to read for free here.

[–] dantel@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You seem to have absolutely no idea how many people just died away in those times. You need food and health care, nobody will just give that to you. It will be survival of the fittest again, much more extreme then what we have today.

You seem to assume that everybody will have enough of everything and we all live in happyness and joy, only doing what you love.

That's of course BS. You will be fighting for your survival and chances are you'll lose that fight. Only thanks to our civilization it is possible at all to sustain that many people.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tribes were found to actually take care of their old, unlike us.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Can confirm.

We also sent the mentally unwell ones who hoarded all the bananas into the forest alone...

[–] dantel@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is a romantic view on that. In reality, 'old' meant 30 years old and then people died pretty soon. There were no real old people. And the very young also died left and right, that's why women had to throw out one child after another just so the tribe wouldn't go extinct.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

That's also not very accurate. Old = 30 is why there are many ways to measure.

6 kids dying before the age of 4 and one guy living to 60 means the average age is 30.

[–] dantel@programming.dev 2 points 20 hours ago

The point is people died very frequently and in no way could we sustain the current population if we went back to those practices. Even if some people got older, a tribe needs a huge surplus of young people to survive. And everyone had to pull their weight one way or another. If people stopped working today, most would absolutely die off and that's it. It is beyond me how some seem to think it would be some kind of paradise where everyone has everything they need. Delusional.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You trust info from the same ones that enslave you?

[–] dantel@programming.dev 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Your username checks out buddy. I'm not enslaved btw.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago

That's what they all say

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 23 hours ago

You're saying there is a giant glowing orb in the sky watching you all day, and you're not allowed to look at it?

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for summarising the mentality of capitalism and why one guy has a trillion dollars, a few others have billions and the rest are fighting for their survival as you describe.

[–] dantel@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, thanks for even more BS. Nothing I said is linked to capitalism, at all.

Enlighten us, how would it go in your mind. Why would you not just fucking die, who will provide for you and why.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It is still possible to gather and grow food and trade with others, even create luxury goods, without having what is considered a "job".

It's a really odd concept that you wouldn't be able to enjoy the world and that you would immediately die without your job.

[–] dantel@programming.dev 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ok listen, we're 8.3 billion people on this world. If everyone goes back to growing and gathering their own food, there is no fucking way you can sustain this population. There is not enough land for everyone to grow their food. There is not enough food to gather if everyone depends on it. There will be a massive fight over resources, where a very small subset will come out on top, a massive amount of people just die and then a good portion of people who will try to survive by serving the winning group.

And no matter where you land, IF you even happen to be the lucky one who survived, you have enough land nobody is strong enough to take from you and you happen to resources in your area you can gather, doing that will be a full time job, massively labor intensive. No matter if your 'regard' this a job or not.

BTW. You can live your dream of gathering your own food right now. It's called being homeless. Knock yourself out.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, we don't have enough space on the planet to farm, even though we do it currently and waste 19% of all food. Communities can farm together and share things. Not every way forward is Mad Max.

Its sad that people can't even fathom a world where people aren't fighting each other to be on top and just want to fight and murder to control all the data centres.

[–] dantel@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Lol. We can sustain and oversupply right now BECAUSE people do their jobs. This becomes absolutely impossible if people just stopped. Do you even have the slightest idea how many people have to do their job in order to build the simplest of machinery needed for modern farming?

Who is building the machines and equipment needed for that? Ok, just for fun - let's imagine someone still does that in your world without jobs, why would they just give it to you or someone else? In exchange for some bones and pretty stones you've found in your backyard? What can you possibly provide that's worth even a fucking tractor? This is so delusional I have really no words for it.

If you think it's so easy and great then go get your like-minded buddies and just do it. What's stopping you? Nobody will care if you play somewhere out in the wilderness.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago

You clearly have never have touched a plant. The amount of work required to farm and feed yourself in a single year is immensely labor intensive. That's just one person. Try doing that with a family of just 3 or 4.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well I guess it's good that very few people would choose to do absolutely nothing if they could literally do anything instead of settling into something they don't like at all just to survive.