this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
348 points (98.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40290 readers
3909 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah, never forget, Sisyphus had meaning in his life, he helped a kidnapped daughter, he secured an ever lasting spring of water for a village.. the gods punished him because he kept tricking them, skirted their rules and their punishments, helping himself and other people, masses of normal people.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He chose to do those things, so... you could say he created his own meaning in the midst of an inherently absurd and meaningless universe? 😉

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yep, that’s the crime, he rejected their bullshit systems, and they can’t have their own illusion destroyed - that they’re inbred irrational, jealous, bottomless pits of power hungry idiots that serve no purpose and shouldn’t be worshipped, but removed from power. he threatened to reveal their illusion and to show people they could make big differences and change the system without the powers of the Gods, so they imprisoned him with meaningless slave labor.

Almost like it’s a metaphor for the endless human condition we find ourselves in with our own “gods”, the men who try to control the world with power, riches, irrational rules and meaningless slave labor.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

"Imagine Sisyphus happy" reeks of corporate middle management extolling the virtues of grind culture to their underlings. I've never thought it was a good argument. Just a cheap cop-out for people who can't face the never-ending barrage of existential despair that comes from truly, deeply questioning the meaning and purpose of life.

Like "Here, find meaning in this menial labor that you're compelled to do by society!" No, you mindless automaton, the whole point of my existential despair is that I've seen through the superficial layers of appearances to grasp the utter meaninglessness at the core of everything. I'm not gonna pretend that I haven't seen through it and stop questioning things just because it's uncomfortable.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Camu has addressed that in his essay on suicide -

it's not that you distract yourself, that's denial, and it's not a full embrace of nothing, that's depression (and suicide). it's an acceptance that things are meaningless - but you as a person can never stop looking for that meaning, in fact just the search itself is what keeps you going. that's the absurd in absurdism, searching for meaning despite knowing it doesn't exist, finding happiness in the journey, making peace with the fact that even if you do reach some goal you'll never feel fulfilled. and even if you become the king of the world and have everything you could ever desire - the rock is still going to roll down, you'll feel like there's still something missing, and you'll need to push the rock again

at least that's my interpretation

[–] softwarist@programming.dev 5 points 21 hours ago

From the Wikipedia summary:

However, the absurd can never be permanently accepted: it requires constant confrontation, constant revolt.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think there's more to existentialism than that, but if it's not for you there are other philosophies available--there's always Schopenhauer.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago

There's definitely more to existentialism than that. I don't think any two existentialist philosophers are alike. Kierkegaard, Sartre, Camus, Heidegger, Watsuji, Nishida, Nishitani, et cetera. None of them are remotely similar other than in being existentialists. It makes sense though, for a school of philosophy that rejects essentialism to be so disparate in ideas.

I do like Schopenhauer, though. So much better than Nietzsche who kinda stole his thunder.