this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
645 points (99.7% liked)

Greentext

8356 readers
1048 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Another element that could be at play here:

He thought it was a dog.

Dogs, because we domesticated them, have muscles around their eyes, that allow them to make eye/eyebrow expressions.

Wolves do not have these. Because they're the ones we did not domesticate for millenia.

So, if he was expecting dog expressions... wolves literally cannot make the same facial expressions.

They essentially always look like they have RBF, in comparison to a dog.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

It's thought the species we domesticated was distinct from wolves of today. That species went extinct in the wild.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interestingly some dog breeds also still lack those muscles, like huskies

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh! You're right, I did not know that.

Huskies are... much closer to being actual wolves though, genetically speaking.

Seems like this applies to malamutes and samoyeds as well...?

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder do dingoes have them. I haven't been able to find any information on that yet

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My, ahem, blind guess would be probably not, as they've... not been widely and thoroughly domesticated for 20,000+ years?

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh the genetic confirmation for dingoes to have arrived in Australia is about 8000 years ago these days. So it's about when did the extra muscles evolve and in which genetic lines? Dingoes and the new guinea singing dog are traced to have come from the wolves domesticated in Asia, so I guess they wouldn't have them unless they evolved independently or the genes spread before they got separated in Guinea and Australia? But then do japanese breeds also not have them since they're from the same lines probably? I don't know, there's just too little information online. Or if there's more, I can't find it

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No idea what the more precise timeline is, for when and where dogs started having eyebrow muscles.

Maybe if we did something comparable to the Human Genome Project, but for dogs, we could figure it out, lol?