345
Benevolent dictator Zuck will give Meta staff 30-minute breaks from keylogging privacy assault
(www.theregister.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
345 points (99.7% liked)
Technology
85212 readers
4561 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Problem is most are handcuffed to meta due to visa restrictions from what my friends have said that work there. I would say they would be better off leaving at this point but they built lives here and have families here.
If you ever are stuck at an employer, never let them know this (assuming they don't already know). I'd keep your mouth shut around coworkers too, in case someone likes to run their mouth.
Buying a house or reproducing can be a quick way to chain yourself down.
The employers do know this as they have to sponsor these people to allow them to come here with H1B Visas. All the tech companies do this.
Chaining people's immigration status to their employment just slavery with extra steps.*
*Yes, I know employees are paid however they can't change jobs and they are stuck with whatever pay the employer gives them.
Its just slavery. This one's called indentured servitude.
Yup, an extremely abused program by them to underpay, and hold them hostage to the company. They could easily hire Americans, especially in the bay, but they chose not to.
Yes, in this case they know ahead of time. That is very true.
There are other situations where it may not be obvious unless you make it known.
Buying a house I'd argue is freeing. Yes you can't move next year, but in about 5 or so you'll have equity (baring any major market downturns) and can always sell. These days a lot of lenders will even allow you to pause payments and take it out of the sale proceeds.
Better than dumping cash into nothingness.
Plus if you absolutely have to due to lack of equity you can rent it out for a time before selling or maybe even moving back.
Owning a home is less flexible, but still the better move financially
You're not wrong (generally speaking, specifically speaking I use the NYT rent vs. ownership calculator to see if it's worth buying or investing in the sp500)
But the problem here is entirely the lack of flexibility. Once an employer knows you are less flexible than the guy in the next cube, you're picking up the slack of the guy that can up and move his ass to the next town over in a week.
Yeah, buying a home is very much a double-edged sword. It can go well but it can also become an anchor.
One thing people don't seem to properly account for (or at least I don't see it talked about much) on the rent vs buy is costs of commuting and opportunity costs related to one's career. Often the best way to get a raise is to change jobs.
Of course there's also more to decision than just financial. It's as much a lifestyle choice as anything else.
Buying may also be less appealing if you are by yourself or just a couple and don't want or need a whole-ass house. The math on buying a condo often isn't all that appealing compared to renting an apartment.