Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
-
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
view the rest of the comments
Who's downvoting this?? Ban those moronic leeches. They're either anti-community or have the reading comprehension of a potato, ffs.
I suspect people who realized it was the former moderator removing the posts, and not the users themselves.
We don't need to be unpleasant to disagreethough, so going forward lets try to avoid that.
Eh... IMO there's a big difference between disagreeing about something reasonable, and disagreeing about the most basic tenets of what makes a community a community.
Kinda' just making room for the sort of hypocritical ilk that ruin so many things. I can think of so many political and religious examples these days but I'll refrain from fully describing such depressing things.
I'd re-read what I said then - again, it was not users deleting their content, but the former moderator. People downvoting were likely responding to the blame being placed on the users - aka, the members of this community - when they were not to blame. The people you just referred to as moronic leeches with the reading comprehension of a potato who were, again, not to blame.
Who is downvoting a post based on what's not in the post title or body? Besides, there are far more downvotes now than when I made my original comment, so it's clearly not people being fooled by previous, now removed comments.
Also, I said or. It's Either they're against a community of answering questions openly, or have the reading comprehension of a potato...
Whats in the post title is blaming users. Its incorrect.
I'd recommend you reconsider who needs to work on their reading comprehension, as well as the attitude coming in here. This is a community, and one where we don't need to come in and attack/name call, especially when you've fundamentally misunderstood the issue.
lol I've understood the issue. The original post is not exactly nuanced. I'm sorry you feel so offended by my opinion that people who do not understand what a community of questions and answers should look like should not be welcome to people who understand what publicly answered questions should look like, but you do you.
Its also entirely wrong, as I've noted to you now many times.
I'm also letting you know politely that coming in with an attitude like that will not be accepted here.
I replied to you because your comment was reported for rule #1. Just because the last mod was lax with managing comments and overzealous with their interpretation of rule #3 doesn't mean I will be.
To put it bluntly - be civil or don't be here.