Pixel Dungeon
This community is a place to talk strategies, tell stories, or discuss anything related to Pixel Dungeon or its many versions.
Rules:
-
1. No hate or adult themes of any kind: NSFW or illegal material, hate speech, personal attacks, harassment, doxxing, bullying, etc. are all strictly forbidden. Crude or offensive language should be kept to a minimum or avoided entirely.
-
2. Posts must directly relate to Pixel Dungeon: All content posted must directly reference Pixel Dungeon or one of its variants in some form. Loose connections or similar nomenclature from irrelevant works do not count.
-
3. Do not use other's work without giving credit: You may post things that were created by other people, but you must link to the original and credit the author. AI generated content is prohibited, as crediting the original authors is impossible.
-
4. Follow site-wide rules: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
We have a few title tags for standout posts:
- [MOD] - Posts by moderators about the community
- [DEV] - Announcements from a developer of a PD version
- [OC] - Self-made original content
Sister Communities:
view the rest of the comments
So you agree that there's a design motif, but don't see a problem with breaking that motif? Based on your table, seeds and darts wouldn't vary by shape, which is already how they are. If I added shape variance then seeds/darts would also appear in the same cell as stones.
I agree that adding icons is a bit redundant for stones (immediately discernible by shape), in the exact same way it would be redundant for seeds and darts (immediately discernible by color), but there are some cases where it may be helpful for players who have a hard time discerning by color (colorblindness, in the extreme case), and it would be inconsistent to add symbols for seeds/darts and not also for stones.
As for the 'elevated' bit, in general I don't want to add a lot of specific and awkward to explain gameplay interactions like that.