this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
46 points (94.2% liked)

Public Health

1783 readers
11 users here now

For issues concerning:

🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@mander.xyz
otter@lemmy.ca
46
No Babies? Blame Capitalism. (jacobin.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/publichealth@mander.xyz
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Capitalism seems so inevitable to us that we sometimes fail to notice its explanatory power. In this case, it’s staring us right in the face. The incentive structures of capitalism run counter to those of child-rearing — and as market logics pervade deeper into every aspect of our society, the business of having babies makes increasingly little business sense.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This article discusses differences between east and west germany before and after reunification.

I would instead like to see a graph of nations on earth comparing fertility with things like economic equality, funds spent on social services, subjective rating of "capitalismness", etc

Looking down the list of countries by fertility, it seems to me that fertility rate is primarily driven by poverty - the more poor people you have, the higher your fertility. The biggest exception is poor countries that are also formerly communist.

In an April 2025 article in the conservative Catholic First Things Magazine, titled “Feminism Against Fertility,” Darel E. Paul blames the decline in Western fertility rates on young women who wish to remain childless because “they have more important priorities or simply like being single.”

To me, this seems more or less correct. In poorer societies, women have less knowledge, less control over their lives and bodies, and fewer opportunities to do things with their lives other than raise children. So, they have lots of kids.

Women in wealthier nations have access to birth control and know that they have other options in life than raising children. So they don't have children, and do other things instead. This is an extremely reasonable descision. And it is caused by feminism.

It is so weird that any time birth rates are mentioned, the left wingers are like "well you need to pay for my childcare!" Bullshit! I know a lot of women, and very few of them have had or have plans to have kids. Why? Because it fucks up your body. It ends all the freedom you have in your life. It takes all your money. And sure, they could get a fair chunk of that back if they leaned on their families - but their families live on the other side of the country in podunk towns they don't want to return to. And also, they don't want to spend that much time with their families.

It seems like a much more reasonable response would be "Yeah, some of us want to take vacations to Maui instead of being sleep deprived and covered in poo. Falling birth rates are a natural response to people being more free and wealthy. We'll deal with it just like we deal with literally every problem humanity has ever encountered."