this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
240 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

85080 readers
4186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Nobody has yet solved the "who watches the watchers?" problem. Because of that, I believe every system of government is doomed to fall to corruption and capture given time.

I know that there are a lot of mechanisms that can be put in place to mitigate that problem, such as adversarial branches and divisions of authority, but I haven't seen one yet that does anything more than prolong things and delay what seems to be the inevitable. Until something big changes, the pendulum seems destined to keep swinging back and forth.

In the meantime, I haven't seen any way to prevent companies from unethically exerting their will over the public that works any better than involving multiple parties in it that are not necessarily aligned and do your best to prevent collusion, like making the government a party to the transaction by way of regulating the process, though that's admittedly far from fool-proof, either.

I'm just trying to lay out the available options at our disposal now as I understand them.

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So it's all Political Entropy, huh?

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

So it would seem! Entropy always wins.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

In the meantime, I haven't seen any way to prevent companies from unethically exerting their will over the public that works any better than involving multiple parties in it that are not necessarily aligned and do your best to prevent collusion

This is just decentralization. This is literally what I alluded to in my root comment. Crypto solves these problems

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

That's just centralization with extra steps. Crypto is easily manipulated by whales and frequently is. At least with governments, I know the names and faces of the people robbing me.