this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
-30 points (14.3% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3308 readers
121 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, many of us argued that key policymakers were fully aware of the risks associated with expanding NATO closer to Russia's borders. Now, newly disclosed documents appear to provide additional evidence supporting that view. I walk through the records, the historical timeline, the warnings issued by British officials in the 1990s, and the decisions that followed. The details are remarkable, and they're not getting much attention.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Causing or risking? Russia started this war. No one else. "Do as I say or I will kill you" isn't someone we should respect.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Risking would be more accurate. So, I think the question is: why risk it? Russia is the villain in this conflict, absolutely, but we did things that we knew might antagonize that villain. So, why did we do those things? What did we hope to accomplish?

Maybe we wanted Russia to invade, thinking it would ultimately weaken Russia. And there seems to be some validity to that strategy. I think in many important ways Russia is weaker today than they were before the war. But do those ends justify the means? It cost a lot of innocent lives. But maybe there was no other way. Personally I think war should be avoided if at all possible. Some might argue that this was necessary, and maybe they're right but I definitely think it's a matter of legitimate debate.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But if Ukraine wishes to be more aligned with Europe than Russia, that is a reasonable choice for them to make.

We were also doing quite a bit of trade with Russia too, it was their choice to fuck relations with the war. Not that it stopped all trade either.c

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

And if Ukraine knew the risks and decided it was a risk worth taking for the prospect of a better future for them, I totally get that.

I do think a lot of good could come out of this, in the end. I think it's already pushed Europe to be more proactive about their own defense. I hope it continues to push Europe to see the Eastern part of the continent as worthy of protection and inclusion.

[–] theloneyank@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago

first day huh?

[–] theloneyank@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

OMGAWD that literly what the USA doing like right NOW... The USA is not protecting its nation but russia is. It is opposite day... I forgot to put my shirt on backwards. I didn't get the memo

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The US started this war in 2014. The war hawk cunt Victoria Nuland admitted as such

[–] theloneyank@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Beautifully put

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The leaked phone call is in no case an admission of the start of the war by the US in 2014. Have you even listened to it? Or are you referring to something else I'm not aware of?

[–] theloneyank@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago

There is a shit stack of evidence.... this is just one little sliver of the shit pile of ya'll are wrong as funk