this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
213 points (99.5% liked)

Politics

1200 readers
375 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A judge ​on Friday ordered ‌the removal of President Donald Trump’s ​name from ​the Kennedy Center for ⁠the Performing ​Arts, ruling that ​the iconic Washington venue cannot be renamed without ​an act ​of Congress.

U.S. District Judge ‌Christopher ⁠Cooper in Washington directed the Trump administration to ​take down ​all ⁠physical signage bearing Trump’s ​name and ​to ⁠eliminate any references to a “Trump Kennedy ⁠Center” ​from ​official materials within 14 days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

One of the big problems is that the world continuously gets more complicated and needs commensurate regulation, but the legislative branch can only handle so much complexity and expertise directly. So it has been delegating more and more of its regulatory powers to agencies that are supposed to be staffed with the experts that can handle that complexity and have that expertise.

But in our system "executing" the law is under a different branch, controlled by the President, so it in effect transfers that power to that office. Congress can't just "take it back" without solving that underlying problem, or the power they take back will vanish due to their lack of capacity to execute it effectively for the good of the people.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It could absolutely function orders of magnitude better. They would have to stop spending 90% or however much time they spend fund raising and meeting with lobbyists.

Stop making decisions/voting on proposals that are hundreds or thousands of pages and voting on it after a day or 2 of review.

Completely remove "riders" from said proposals so that only the issue at hand is being voted on an not unrelated bullshit they want to push through without anyone noticing in those hundreds of pages that no one reads all of.

And for fuck sakes disallow anyone other than the representative who brings it to the table to actually author the god damned thing. Fucking parasites

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

all they really have to do is move all the departments under the congress. They can have the president still bring forth canidates and the congress votes to whittle them down until one gets over 50%. If none get over 50 the president has to produce more canidates. Maybe make a department to identify canidates that get mixed in as well. then the departments work relatively independently with the president acting as a central source of data management and he brings to congress any necessity for the deparment head to change policy.