this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
226 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

15997 readers
304 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 71 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm shocked its only 60% if I'm being honest.

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's advertising: they think they are "free" and really wanted to have a car

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No? Forced means something is unwanted. My interpretation is that there is not enough public transport and they wish there was.

[–] FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

yes?

40% don't feel forced.

'they [the 40%] think they [the 40%] are “free” and really wanted to have a car'

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I would have guessed much higher.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Could possibly be that their population is almost entirely concentrated in a few cities where there is sufficient public transport infrastructure.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I doubt it. Canadian cities are not known for their transit. Plus in Ontario the premier made building bike lanes illegal.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Canadian transit inefficiency is why the famous urbanist channel NotJustBikes started his work and moved away from there.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Quick look says it's not much different from US urban population numbers, so that must not be it.
And they have the same 60% also.
Meanwhile, roughly 58% of car-owning adults express a strong interest in living car-free or are completely open to ditching their vehicles if viable infrastructure existed.