this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
958 points (98.2% liked)

Brand New Sentence

172 readers
751 users here now

Showcasing the brazen and nouveau in English communication.

  1. Be cool to each other.
  2. Post title must be the sentence, include username if available.
  3. Link for context if possible.
  4. Tag NSFW where applicable.

I'm looking for another mod, someone chill. DM me if you're interested.

founded 6 days ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The goal of capitalism should be to create competition to generate general maximum efficiency.

You can do that under socialism as well. The problem with capitalism isn't the competition to generate maximum efficiency, it's the monopolization of that efficiency for profit rather than actual good. Why should we rely on the private sector to do what is best for society when publicly traded socialist companies can do the same without the dragon hoarding?

[โ€“] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Groups generally do not generate the initial idea, don't execute the initial vision, and are less agile to do so. There should be some incentive for individuals to drive their ideas for a time, and to benefit from that disproportionately, again for a time. Businesses need to go through a few stages: startup regulation to establish a fair profit window, evaluation of an ongoing competitive window, and lastly a review of consolidation and convergence and conversion to a public utility. The idea that some system can be setup such that everyone benefits all the time from some individual's IP is pie in the sky, but we can certainly greatly improve the hoarding issue. The absolute most important part of that is to decouple big business ownership and power from an individual back into the government, since that's where the excess influence ends up anyway.