politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It's not 'interesting,' it is change. Yes Trump 2 also promised change and proved himself to somewhat be an agent of chaos. When people experienced the Biden years and their lives just kept getting worse by 'returning to normal politics,' they were willing to burn down the US instead of dealing with normal politics again.
People largely didn't support Trump because he is racist or interesting or what have you; but simply because the worst case scenario is the destruction of the US government, and the best case scenario is something that is not the same shit that has crushed them, their parents, and their grand parents for as long as they've been alive.
Trump correctly identified 'the swamp,' or the 'deep state,' or the idea that there is an embedded rot that exists in the US ruling class that exists solely to crush the working class. That there are people and groups explicitly working to make sure the rich stay rich, the poor stay poor, and that the law binds the latter and is disregarded by the former without consequence. He literally told on himself and his homies, but attributed it to just the government instead of the entirety of capital.
This resonates with people. Even if he is also a part of capital, he is at worst incompetent and will do enough damage to capital that the average worker might end up better. At the very least Capital would be hurt like the working class has been hurt.
That is an objectively better outcome than returning to normal politics. That is objectively better for most people than 'we'd be at brunch.'