this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
362 points (99.2% liked)

Greentext

8252 readers
777 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip -2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

At least in the US, I'm not sure if purely textual would ever be illegal. You could likely get away with a visual depiction of the scence with current law.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The Pedophile-in-Chief is ok with it, even though he personally prefers them to be teenaged, he'll gladly start a war and crash the global economy to defend him and his pedo pals from too much scrutiny in the Epstein files.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Pretty sure this is case law from like 70 years ago, but okay rant on