this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
732 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

11861 readers
1557 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

she’s still useful. We shouldn’t just give up that utility because she’s a horrible person.

Idk, that strategy can definitely backfire. I'm sure significant chunks of the GOP regretted backing the 'useful idiot' Trump once he grew too powerful to control. Maybe what we should do with their conspiracy theorists, grifters and propagandists, is starve them of attention?

Being too pure is how we let them take power in the first place.

Was it though? Was Biden too pure? Or are you saying that this all comes down to "PC culture"?

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 days ago

I really fear this angle. "we can use her" will effectively sane-wash this person and make her seem more reasonable to the less informed voters. I don't want a MTG presidency.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Never mind the GOP. Hillary fucking Clinton spent millions of dollars promoting Trump in the run up to the 2016 election, because she wanted to make the Republicans look more radical and dangerous, and Trump was the most radical, dangerous candidate in the race.

Thanks, Hillary. Good call.

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I guess you're referring to this?

Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign (Wikipedia):

In a review of Clinton's 32 general election TV ads, the Associated Press found that 24 of those ads show or mention Trump. The majority of those 24 ads feature raw footage of him rather than others opining on his words and actions.

Interestingly, the title of the mentioned AP article is "Clinton's 'nasty' Trump ads are mostly his own words" - it doesn't criticize the campaign's choice at all.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe what we should do with their conspiracy theorists, grifters and propagandists, is starve them of attention?

That is not something we can control. That's in them, not us.

Was it though? Was Biden too pure? Or are you saying that this all comes down to "PC culture"?

He was too "safe" for sure. The left rarely is willing to get it's hands dirty. The right always is. They will use anything when it's useful to them, no matter how dirty it may be. If there's a tool that's useful to us, we need to be willing to pick it up.

Now, this all should be couched in language like "if the crazy space lazer lady understood this, you should be able to." It should always be reminding them she's insane, just that they must be too if she's this far ahead of them.