this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
272 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

84816 readers
3776 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, so what's the black stuff and why is the grass dying then? I guess they just need to expand what they're testing for.

Or conduct an inspection of the plant itself and find out what they're using, and where that pipe goes.

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago

I should be more clear. I'm not saying there is no need to investigate further. Just that some of the reported findings seem overblown in the article's I've read, in my opinion. There needs to be more information to answer your question. "Why is the grass dying?" Who knows, toxic chemical, or just water logged grass. Black looking water coming from a black pipe? Maybe it's treated water and safe, maybe it's not. Needs more information. I'm kind blown away that the lab didnt collect water at the discharge point.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing in the lab report. Everything in the lab report is far to low to be 'black stuff'. So I don't know and those who do are not talking.

So far I have to go with this is nothing but haters trying to yell without concern for facts. If we get more details I may change my mind but for now this is nothing and anyone saying otherwise should be embarrassed for their lack of concern for facts.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s still an illegal discharge. There are multiple things listed that are not good for the local environment. Even phosphorus and ammonia can be damaging by stimulating algae blooms.

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It's not though. TCEQ authorized a discharge water permit and has investigated the water discharge. Now, if people are being dishonest, that's another story, that will likley be somthing we find out some years in the future. Your not wrong about algae blooms. Though, the lab didnt sample the water straight from the discharge source but further down the ditch. And thats all farmland around there. Farms use ammonia nitrate, as fertilizer.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Neither hexavalent chromium nor arsenic appears in Tesla’s TCEQ discharge permit as an allowable pollutant. Neither was tested for during TCEQ’s February investigation.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What it did not do, explicitly, was grant Tesla the right to use public or private property for wastewater conveyance.