this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
859 points (93.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3283 readers
643 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't care about out of pocket expenses when my premiums went from...

You have to care about out of pocket expenses. If you pay less in premiums but then more in out of pocket, the you aren't really paying less, are you? You personally might have ended up paying more, but as a population people paid less.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a guy in his late 20s, my out of pocket expenses became 100% when premiums rose to the point that I couldn't afford insurance anymore. Maybe Obamacare helped someone somewhere. It didn't help the middle class. And the implication that it only increases costs for the rich is absurd.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that costs didn't increase. But those costs were increasing before Obamacare and stayed at a steady rate of increase after Obamacare. Yeah, the system sucks. Obamacare made it suck less for some people like my partner who survived childhood leukemia who can't have a "pre-existing condition" held against them. More than 50 million people have been covered by the ACA since 2024 with more than 24 million currently enrolled as of 2025. Many of those are people making less than 150% of the federal poverty level.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

stayed at a steady rate of increase after Obamacare.

91% in a year. If they'd been increasing at that rate before Obamacare they'd have been in the trillions of dollars per month range by 2014