this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
605 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

21529 readers
1255 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I would say the test results were conclusive, if nothing else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if they charged the guy who crashed his Veyron in Galveston Bay? I mean with something other than insurance fraud.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I was trying to figure out why that name sounded familiar. I hadn't heard of the story you referenced. I'm also pretty sure I've never been near anywhere with that name, though I think I might have encountered a road with a similar one.

Eventually, I remembered a book my then 5yo gave me after it was withdrawn from the school library and offered as a "keep forever" book.

The book did tell an interesting story partially based on real life first person accounts of a famous storm / flood, but overall it was fictional. There were some details I thought were inappropriate. I don't know if those details (casual racism and acceptance of same, both by otherwise redeemable characters and by the victims of it; fairly graphic representation of bodily harm) match the reality of the time but, to put it bluntly, I agree with whomever made the decision to withdraw the book from a children's library.

(I'm not sure what age group has access to the library. I do think it's important for schools to allow access to uncomfortable facts, especially of history ... But again, my kid was five at the time, so presumably other similarly aged kids also had access and I don't think that they needed to hear these stories at that age.

My kid didn't read, nor appear to want to read, the book, but given that they get freaked out by my surgery scars I don't think that they would have benefited from doing so.)

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't know if those details (casual racism and acceptance of same, both by otherwise redeemable characters and by the victims of it; fairly graphic representation of bodily harm) match the reality of the time

1900 Texas, yeah, it matches the reality of the time. We're talking about a state that 40 years before that had voted overwhelmingly to secede from the Union and ousted their governor when he refused to join the Confederacy. We're talking full on Jim Crow, segregation as law, redlining, employment gating, etc etc - it was very bad.

But yeah I mean I probably wouldn't say a 5yo should be engaging with that content, but I could see a 10 year old maybe? It feels 6th grade level is about right for that?