this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
415 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

21523 readers
1560 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47052375

To understand how a New York City private jet tax could actually be implemented, you need to understand who controls the airports.

The Port Authority is a bi-state agency jointly controlled by the governors of New York and New Jersey with an annual operating budget of $10.1 billion and a proposed $45 billion capital plan from 2026 – 2035. It operates JFK, LaGuardia, Newark Liberty, and Teterboro — all rated high tax-risk under current political conditions. Teterboro Airport, which does not allow scheduled airline flights and only services private flights, handles approximately 177,000 arrivals and departures annually.

Westchester County Airport (HPN) is not a Port Authority facility. It is owned and operated by Westchester County — outside Mamdani’s direct political sphere and outside the joint gubernatorial control structure of the Port Authority. This makes it the most insulated major reliever airport in the New York metro under current political conditions.

Republic Airport (FRG) on Long Island is New York State property — its vulnerability depends on whether Governor Hochul aligns with Mamdani’s agenda, which remains an open question.

Key policy context: The Port Authority has the authority to set fees, surcharges, and access terms at its facilities without requiring standard legislative processes in many scenarios. The question isn’t just whether a tax gets proposed — it’s whether the mechanism to implement it already exists. In many cases, it does.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There's different types of tax and different ways to skirt by.

A lot of taxes can be skirted by making your private jet owned by your company. Now it's a business expense, not taxable income. But of course the IRS isn't very happy about it if you use it for personal reasons. Of course most still will. VAT/Sales tax? Yea you get to claim that back in most countries if buying things as a business.

Then there's a whole other issue on lack of excise duty on jet fuel. This applies to both private jets and airlines. If you drive a car, you have to pay excise, but not if you fly. Yay! (Ideally, in my opinion, both should be taxed, but public transit (not airlines though) should receive an exemption for the excise similar to how farmers get it in my country). IIRC this is a global issue too.

You still end up paying minor amounts of tax on different things if you fly a private jet, even if it's owned by your company, but... percentage wise, it's nothing compared to a regular commuter who privately buys a car and fuels it up at a station.

Honestly, if not banning them altogether, private jets used by companies should at least be taxed as if they were owned by a private person. There's little business use case for being able to fly a tiny amount of people anywhere on a whim. It's purely for personal convenience of the ultra rich.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

That’sa lotta words magic man… and we read them all thx this was very based and valid