250
We could even put these big, long cars on rails to reduce wear-and-tear on the roads. Not sure what we could call them, though.
(media.piefed.social)
this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
250 points (99.6% liked)
Fuck Cars
15785 readers
919 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
... are you aware of buses and trains.
I'm very aware of NJTransit, the MTA, and SEPTA. I can't drive, but I know that they cost more in my taxes to run than they would if they were privatized but legislated in terms of salaries, etc. It's just a matter of fact that for them to run a profit, fares would be massive.
Not to mention, the cost of taxis/"rideshares" when the buses & trains inevitably can't get to where you need to go, or when they're 15+ minutes late, or when they only run so rarely that they may as well not run at all. If you run a bus/train service and want to actually compete with cars, you need to have a truly massive number of vehicles on the road and rail, which means a massive skilled labor force between mechanics and crew, dispatchers, drivers, and route managers - all of whom expect to be paid more than minimum wage. And you can't assume 100% fill on every bus trip (that's how you get situations where the buses run once an hour or less), so you have to charge based on minimum fill rate, so that every ride is at least guaranteed breakeven.
In what fucking world would privatized public transport be cheaper.
In order for them to run a profit in the current, individual car-dominated society, NJTransit would have to...
... double its fares.
In other words, still far fucking cheaper than a car payment, car insurance, gas, and maintenance. Hope you like parking fees, too.
Fuck man, I've lived in incredibly shitty areas for public transportation and most of the cities I've lived in have always been open to me, a fucking cripple with a limp. You're treating edge cases like the norm.
... okay? Do you think they're being paid minimum wage now...?
I really hope your job doesn't involve making decisions for any businesses, because that's a horrible understanding of firm economics. You don't charge based on the prospect of every individual ride breaking even; you charge knowing that the reliability of the service in low-usage periods ensures the continued usage during high-usage (and thus high-revenue) periods.
On a related note... Public transport is INFRASTRUCTURE, which is by definition something you INVEST in. There should be no need to make money or break even or whatever.