this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
107 points (97.3% liked)

science

27102 readers
479 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeet!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Based on assumptions about how much light is reflected, 2026JH2 is currently estimated to be between 15 and 30 meters (49 and 98 feet) in diameter. At the smaller end of that range, Michel said, it would be similar in size to a bolide, or fireball, that exploded in the atmosphere over the city of Chelyabinsk, Russia, in 2013, shattering windows and injuring 1,000 people. At the highest end of the range, it would be closer in size to an object that exploded near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in Siberia in 1908, which pulverized large swaths of forest.

I find it amazing that doubling a small object’s size seems to a produce a non-linear increase in impact effect. The majority of the earth’s surface is water or sparsely inhabited, but something just 30 meters across has the effect of a low nuclear yield. A week’s worth of notice on one of these striking near a large city would be pretty chaotic.

With all the private space exploration gaining traction, it surprises me that there’s not more dedicated to detecting objects that intersect our trajectory.

[–] zout@fedia.io 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you double the diameter, the volume increases 8-fold, and also the mass.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Additionally, doubling the diameter results in doubling the surface area to volume ratio which increases the percentage of the mass that survives atmosphere entry.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago

Small ones will mostly ablate in the atmosphere. Bigger ones will still end up solid enough to come apart and either strike or explode above ground.