this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
793 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

11824 readers
2553 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(TikTok screencap)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

We desperately need a tax on securities. I don't particularly care about taxing luxury products, because those products are produced by workers, who pay taxes and buy things. But securities are the "means of production".

Don't tax the dollar value of the security. Don't force them to liquidate their shares before they can pay a tax. Just go ahead and transfer a percentage of their shares of each security to the IRS, who can liquidate it on the open market, slowly over time.

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Tbh Just taxing securities backed loans as income would close a big hole

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

I don't think that would actually do anything at all. Banks would just loosen their lending requirements, and all those securities-backed loans would just become personal loans to high-net-worth individuals. The investment portfolios of the ultra-rich need to be directly targeted.

I'd take 1% per year. This tax is only on the obscenely-wealthy. Every natural person can exempt $1 million of their total portfolio. No exemptions for artificial persons. The IRS is limited to liquidating no more than 1% of total traded volume of any issue on any given day: >99% of trades will be market trades, so the IRS shares will have minimal effect on value.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Part of the reason we call some securities liquid, vs not, is that some can't easily be divided.

The govt can't easily take hold of 1.3% of someone's family mansion. Or a rare painting that they got hold of.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

I don't think I've heard a definition of "security" that would refer to either of those examples. Perhaps "registered securities" is closer to my intended meaning?

I would not intend for this tax to apply to personal assets or the owner's primary residence, but it is not particularly difficult to divide ownership of real property among multiple entities. Applied to investment properties, the government would basically be a lienholder.