this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
340 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

84769 readers
3314 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

ArXiv is a place where researchers put papers before they are accepted and peer reviewed ("preprints"). Requiring this would defeat the purpose of arXiv, which is to allow fellow researchers to see material that is not peer reviewed before it is published. Before arXiv, this happened only through informal discussions and meetings during conferences.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Commentor is not saying they should do this. They are doing this.

“The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue,” Dietterich wrote.

arXiv has postprints, too, and it means that once a journal has accepted your work, you can prerelease before they publish.

But yes, they are effectively telling the research community to get their shit together before submitting, or pay the price.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh my bad, I interpreted the comment as saying it should be a general requirement.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yea, I figured! Pretty heavy handed on arXiv's part, so I'm not surprised by the interpretation. Though, I like the heavy handedness.

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

submit ai slop once = arxiv doesn't trust you for the rest of your life.

fine by me

[–] exu@feditown.com 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Great reason not to publish AI slop then

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

ArXiv uses an endorsement system so that not everyone can post there. However, sometimes dubious "scientists" manage to slip through the cracks, which is why there is moderation for cases such as these.