this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
572 points (98.5% liked)

me_irl

7658 readers
2847 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't tell much, the important stat is how big of a risk is there that a given person will be abducted at all. Obviously 73% sounds horrifying but 73% of what percentage of the population? Who's doing the abducting? Are there other factors that increase your risk bf being abducted?

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

73% of abductions are females. Therefore 27% of abductions are male.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

100 % of lightning victims are people.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

And 50% of my phalanges are on my left side.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 19 hours ago

Okay, but how big of a risk is there for actually being abducted. How many people total out of a given population are victims? Are there other factors like primarily family members, or location based or things like that? Just knowing that most abductees are women doesn't really tell you how concerned women need to be about this. Not arguing for or against the idea, I don't have the data. Just saying the stat you're using by itself isn't valuable.