this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
512 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

9827 readers
165 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Surveillance creep is once again striking in the age verification debate. This is happening at the FCC this time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (19 children)

~~systemd has nothing to do with this lmao, if you see this and immediately think "this wouldn’t have happened if we didn’t let systemd discuss putting an age field 2 months ago!!!!!1!" you are severely, severely misled. to stay nice.~~

nvm i’m pretty sure this is just ragebait

[–] meowmeow@quokk.au -1 points 5 days ago (17 children)

Hehe. The people who ignored systemd are the same people who don’t think any of this is a problem. The kind of people who can’t understand that you have to fight this kind of bullshit anytime it pops up or it eventually wins.

It just won.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago (10 children)

i guarantee you the lawmakers who pass this kind of awful law have no idea what systemd even is or what it does

blaming it (or "systemd simps") for this is a colossal waste of time. the surveillance society has been progressively installed in the imperial core ever since 9/11, age verification and what’s it turning into is a consequence of this, and systemd adding an age field is a consequence of that.

blaming systemd for this shit, even in part, is so bafflingly silly, such a ridiculous example of swapping cause and effect that i can’t imagine you’re doing it sincerely but apparently people agree with this???

that’s like blaming the small creek in your garden for the existence of the raging river upstream. idk.

[–] vanillama@programming.dev 0 points 4 days ago

Thank you for being a voice of reason

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)