this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
477 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84668 readers
4184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] t_berium@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

If I ever see anyone wearing one, I will hit them in the face. Hard. And step on this shit.

Edit: Ridicule me all you want. This Stasi shit must not get a foothold anywhere. Truly dystopian times.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Sure, these glasses are a corporate surveillance state nightmare, but keep in mind, assault shouldn’t be something you consider, unless it’s justifiable.

Most places have law stating the public can be recorded freely by anyone, which is basically why these exist, so the justification needs to actually hold weight, such as being stalked or other reasons.

There’s also the fact that these glasses could be used by disabled individuals who are using them as aids, and quite frankly, assaulting a disabled person, even if you don’t know they’re disabled is a significant aggravating factor in court. You really don’t want that for yourself.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's three felonies, counting the threat

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Supposing the glasses are set to filming at inappropriate situations and the wearer of the glasses doesn't respond to friendly requests - what then?

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our reaction to such a scenario should be the same as if they were recording with their phone.

You wouldn't turn into a blithering feral beast because someone was recording you with their phone. Why should it matter if they're using glasses instead?

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

It doesn't.
The difference is that it's easier to spot a phone in the hands of people where they shouldn't have it in their hands pointed at you (say public toilet, sauna, changeingroom) than glasses in recording mode pointed at you.
I can magine scenarios that escalate more easily with glasses than phones.

You will get your ass beat

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Same. Internet Karens are enabling these authoritarian times.

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Lol at the replies to this comment. Seems like you hit a nerve.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

> This Stasi shit must not get a foothold anywhere.

Completely valid. Resistance architecture is eroding.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago