thebirdspapaya_snark
Hello new Lemmy friends!
Word on the street tells us our community is regularly making it the all page. While this is very cool news to hear, we can see how the sudden emergence of our posts in your feed might feel jarring and probably raises some questions. And also how, without knowing the backstory, our community might appear less than virtuous, so here’s a very brief introduction which hopefully will clear a few things up.
The woman we’re discussing is a body positive influencer and media personality who has gained fame and wealth by lying, manipulating, exploiting her children for content, plagiarizing BIPOC creators and blaming her BIPOC content editor for it (thereby ruining her career), among other things. Her fraudulent behavior is no different (I’d argue worse) from the likes of Jay Shetty (google him if you don’t know who he is or what he did). She’s the latest in a long line of grifting influencers who are abusing their power, taking advantage of their position and exploiting their followers. The difference is that she’s Canadian. Our laws around social media and advertising aren’t as clear (and where they are she’s disobeyed them), add to that, our mainstream media has protected her from those who’ve tried to expose her grift and silenced/intimidated anyone who’s tried to speak out.
Our Reddit sub was taken down due to reports of copyright infringement, which is unfounded and categorically untrue as no one ever tried to steal her work and pass it off as their own. The mods have made an appeal. While at first glance it may seem like we’re just “shitting on her” the sub has been more devoted to investigation and posting proof of her lies than just bitching for the sake of bitching. The reality is that she’s hurt, manipulated and let down a lot of people. She stole intellectual property and employment, caused mental distress and has repeatedly told lies to boost engagement and profit off her audience, so people are understandably upset that their voices are being silenced.
We’re grateful to have been welcomed so kindly by so many of you, and to those sticking around to watch the drama unfold, we’re glad to have you!
**all posts are alleged.
Rules:
-Please follow Lemmy content guidelines. See https://lemmy.ca/
-Minor's Right to Privacy: No posts about the children whatsoever. No mention of full names and no photos. Minors must be completely removed from all photos/videos. No exceptions. This goes for ANY child. No just TBP's.
-No snarking on the character or appearance of any of the children. This is a site dedicated to Sarah Landry.
-No posting information that is not readily available online/NoDoxxing: Influencers post an abundance of personal information online. Examples of doxxing include:
- Posting an individual's phone number or address on the internet.
- Releasing information about an individual's family, place of employment, or other private documents.
- Encouraging others to use released information to harass an individual.
-Comments Regarding Mental Health: Jokes or Snide remarks about mental health or unaliving oneself will not be tolerated under any circumstances. No armchair diagnosing.
-Do not post or solicit communication with TBP or related influencers: This includes screenshots and references to 'this is what I commented.' Please message a mod if you would like to share anything anonymously.
-No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, body shaming or other ism/bigotry.
-No TBP crusaders
-No commenting with the sole purpose of being rude/insulting: while criticism/debate is welcome on the page, being purposefully mean, insulting and rude is not.
-No brigading/incitement of mass harassment. Do not post links to affiliate sites, or incite members of the sub to brigade against TBP/related parties (this includes brands).
-Fact check and do your homework: Make sure to research before posting. If you are posting photos or videos that are filtered/photoshopped, make sure it is blatantly obvious. No rumours. no speculations (example Ozempic use).
-No overly vulgar language.
-No advertisement of any kind
-No duplicate posts
view the rest of the comments
TheBirdsPapaya is going away next week. I wonder if she purchased tickets to the SI Swim Social Event in NYC. Or will she be attending the immersive 2-day event on the Qwickies ad budget?
Sarah seems desperate to be part of the SI world; she is only a part of it when Knix or Quickies pay for her to play. Sarah Nicole Landry didn't earn her walk on the runway through casting, the Swim Search, or being scouted.
Does Sarah understand that Authentic Brands Group owns SI Swim (Not Sports Illustrated)? The SI Swim magazine is published under a licensing deal with Minute Media; however, Authentic Brands Group retains ownership and control.
Authentic Brands Group transformed SI Swim from a special issue magazine (editorial) that targeted male readers into a brand strategy that is aimed at women and relies on commercial $ particpation from brands. It's one big advertorial.
Authentic Brands Group bought the SI Swim brand in 2019 for $110 million USD. Authentic Brands Group charges for licensing and commercial participation in SI Swim and its various live events. The focus of Authentic Brands Group is to grow SI Swim as a brand through live events, co-branding, licensing, and brand promotion at live events and in the pages of the magazine.
To appeal to women (Authentic Brands Group's new target market), the company created "Pay with Change" (January 2022 kick-off), a program that required brands to create actions that would create a "better world for women" (source Edelman/ 2024/ company presentation).
The goal of "Pay With Change" is to turn "every media partnership into a movement for women's progress", essentially, Authentic Brands Group/ SI Swim required brands/advertisers to virtue signal while still PAYING massive sums of money to participate. Obviously, this approach has been criticized for being hypocritical. Authentic Brands Group was riding the 2020-wave of self-love BS (and gunning for millennial women's dollars). While the program hasn't been scrapped, it has been diminished. Look at this years line up of cover models. The four cover models all have the more traditional SI body (visibly fit).
A reminder to Sarah Nicole Landry, who claims to have been selected by SI Swim magazine to walk the runway at the 2024 Swimweek:
**-Knix paid to be featured in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue and at Miami Swim Week. Their presence was part of a paid commercial investment through the magazine's structured Pay With Change initiative. (Source Edleman) **
-Knix worked with Edleman directly and through ABG’s internal brand-monetization division to buy into the"Changemaker" framework.
-Knix signed on as an official paid advertising partner starting with the 2023 issue. Under this model, brands buy ad space, and SI matches the investment with editorial and online integration. This financial partnership secured Knix the distinction of being the first leakproof swimwear brand featured in the print magazine (modelled by Katie Austin).
-Knix's broader marketing spend extended to Miami Swim Week, where Knix purchased runway showcase placement to debut pieces like their Sarah Nicole Landry collaboration
-Instead of Landry being selected through traditional independent editorial casting, her appearance on the SI Swimsuit Runway Show at Miami Swim Week was designed to debut the "Knix x The Birds Papaya" co-branded swimwear collection.
-Knix purchased the runway integration as a marketing activation. Landry walked the runway, specifically modelling the pieces she "designed" with Knix (such as the Cinch Shaper One-Piece and ruffle string combo), acting as a brand ambassador within Knix’s paid sponsorship slot.
-By securing this placement within their broader corporate ad spend, Knix successfully bridged the gap between traditional print media advertising and influencer-driven live commerce.
-Sarah Nicole Landry has not been independently featured by Sports Illustrated Swimsuit as a model since Knix ceased the paid partnership that initially secured her runway spot.
-Landry applied through standard independent channels to be cast as a model for the upcoming regular issue. However, she was not selected by the editorial team for a standalone, non-sponsored feature.
Sarah Nicole Landry has publicly framed her runway appearance as an organic invitation, downplaying or omitting the fact that it was directly tied to Knix’s corporate sponsorship deal.
-The "Surprise Invitation" Narrative: In media interviews and viral podcast clips, Landry frames the moment as a sudden, unexpected call out of the blue, stating: "My manager messaged and was like, 'Sports Illustrated has invited you to walk their runway in Miami this year'... I was terrified, truly felt so out of my element with an incredible amount of 'why me?'
-Omitting the Commercial Structure: When telling this story to her audience, she focuses on her personal history of applying independently to the magazine for years. She presents the runway slot as the universe finally answering her dream, rather than a contracted brand activation meant to launch her product line.
-The Corporate Reality: Sports Illustrated Swimsuit’s own coverage of the event explicitly noted that the runway slot was organized in tandem with Knix.
Impact on Audience Perception:
-Deepened Core Loyalty: Landry’s 2+ million followers viewed the milestone as an authentic, earned triumph for body-positive representation. By presenting it as a surprise validation of her "real body", the narrative generated massive emotional engagement (such as a viral clip garnering over 70 million views). Her community celebrated it as a grassroots victory against industry beauty standards.
-Insulation Against Backside Criticism: Because the audience believed she was selected strictly on merit, they interpreted any online pushback or body-shaming she received as an attack on body-positivity itself. This successfully mobilized her followers to defend her online ecosystem.
-Skepticism Among Industry Observers: For media literate circles and brand analysts, the omission of the "Knix x The Birds Papaya" commercial tie-in fueled skepticism. Critics point to it as an example of performative vulnerability, in which a major corporate contract is masqueraded as a spontaneous, spiritual breakthrough.
**Legal Ramifications **
By framing a paid Knix corporate activation as a spontaneous, merit-based selection, Sarah Nicole Landry successfully bypassed competitive editorial gatekeeping, weaponized audience trust for massive organic engagement, and manufactured an elite cultural status that commands inflated fees from future sponsors who believe she has independent mainstream media cachet.
This behaviour is unethical because it sanitizes a transactional product launch under the guise of an authentic, body-positive spiritual breakthrough, violating consumer trust and distorting the perceived meritocracy for aspiring creators. Regarding legality, this narrative strategy risks violating the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Endorsement Guides and Canada's Competition Act (as Landry is Canadian)
The regulatory bodies mandate that influencers must "clearly and conspicuously" disclose any "material connection", such as financial ties, corporate sponsorships, or co-branded business relationships, that could affect how an audience evaluates an endorsement. While the runway items themselves were commercialized, failing to disclose that her entire presence on the platform was bought by an advertising partner constitutes deceptive marketing by omission, as it misleads consumers into believing a commercial placement was an independent editorial endorsement.** (Courtesy of Landry Legal) And yes, the name sent me 😂
-Joanna Griffith's language used in the Knix SI Swim/ The Birds Papaya press release is misleading. Joanna tends to use misleading language in an ambiguous way, since losing a class-action lawsuit (twice) for claiming that Knix are PFA-free. Joanna, who once claimed "no Photoshop" on Knix marketing visuals, now makes statements like "Photoshop, who needs her?" Joanna is aware of what she is saying and presents it in a fashion that doesn't make her liable. Sarah, however, outright lied.
-I wonder if this report will upset Joanna enough to buy a last-minute sponsorship with Authentic Brands Group for the SI Swim Social Club. I hope so, it would help me out ;)
Amazing. This should be a substack.
Wow! This is quite the read! Thank you!! I just wish this were more public so people can see what a fraud she really is. I hate arguing with her brain dead followers on FB but hopefully one day they will see the light.
Thank you so much for comprehensively outlining the facts. Sarah’s big dream walk and her denying it had anything to do with Knix has bothered me since it happened.
this is incredible. wow! is this info published anywhere else? how do we make sure this reaches a wider audience?
Interesting, right? A friend provided me with the information. It's a snippet. There seems to be some sort of access to the deal and PR/sales conversations.
It will be fascinating to see how Sarah behaves next week if she attends the SI "Social Club". Will she act like she's part of SI?
I wonder if this post @thebirdspapaya can be considered an undisclosed ad? 🔽
Joanna's fictional story makes me chuckle. On what planet does a model get to decide what outfit/ or brand they are going to wear? Does Joanna think the audience is stupid? "We had this swim collab that was slated for actually later in June but decided, knowing Sarah was going to be included [on the SI Swimsuit runway] that [there's no] better way to launch a collection [than] to have the person who helped design it walk on it on the runway," Griffith tells us." *This type of decision would have to go through the Authentic Brands Group sales team, be approved, and presented to the styling/show team. I guess Joanna assumes that we all believe that she's in charge of the world. She's lucky to be Canadian; in the USA, she'd be just another annoying entrepreneur who exaggerates.
this is so fascinating and so infuriating! like, sarah is SO obviously full of shit and lies… her whole life revolves around turning her narcissistic self-obsession into a 24/7, never-ending commercial for all the shit she shills. but the way knix astroturfed the SI thing (and also astroturfed the warped ~bopo cinderella~ narrative that went along with it) is a whole other level of manipulation. sarah nicole landry is a liar and a cheater, and she doesn’t need help doing either of these things. but she DOES have help lying and cheating, she has help from powerful ($$) people and organizations. it’s just so fucked. thank you so much for sharing this info, please share as much of it as you are able! i'm curious if anyone knows more about how shine works, i feel like we don’t talk enough about them and they’re probably also shady as fuck.
I always wonder what would happen if Shine goes down? Would these “influencers” continue to exist?
i also wonder this! i think it’s likely we will find out 👀 the influencer wave has for sure crested, we can see how desperately they’re all scrambling to cling to relevance and revenue. i swear sometimes i can feel the panic and desperation radiating off of sarah in her stories.
Is it at all possible that Sarah is just delusional enough to believe Joanna didn’t buy her spot and her benefactor engineered this whole mythical story that she was chosen to make her dream come true? If this is true it must be a real kick in Sarah’s gut to never be considered again even though she made sure she attended all the events for the next two years.
I wonder about this. Joanna is sneaky. More files from retouchers who worked on Knix's "we don't photoshop" campaigns landed in my inbox.
🫖 🫖 🫖
Ohhh spill the tea!😉
Excellent!
When you lie for a living reality and make believe begin to meld together.
Got worst dressed list too. She looks so desperate clinging on to SI. Cringe af
Her inner thighs melded together on thar walk. Weird
Also does she ever even wear her collabs? i haven’t seen this pink gingham suit in her feed really, it must have ebbed and flowed out of her closet
Does she wear anything more than once??
I don’t think she is going. She mentioned being on a beach 🤷♀️
This is an incredible article you've written! You should tune it up and submit to some professional media channels. This could literally be her downfall. Please definitely post on Substack though! I'm itching to restack ❤️
Thank you. It's mostly content from my friend. I can't take credit. I'll suggest they do a Substack.