this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
351 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

84603 readers
4162 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 8 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

It sounds like it's just insertable toys, so it might be a liability thing if they're afraid people are selling unsafe toys? Who knows. That's a really weird distinction and definitely one that payment processors don't make.

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes liability. That makes sense.

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 8 points 14 hours ago

Another article confirmed it was payment processors again. This is why we can't have nice things.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Does Kickstarter have liability in general for Kickstarted projects? I'd kind of assume that that's on the specific project. I can't imagine that Kickstarter is in any kind of position to really do a domain-specific evaluation of whether a given project is in line with local regulations.

[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 6 points 20 hours ago

IIRC, no, they don't. They put the onus of proving the project is legit on the project maker and on the backers to be vigilant not falling for too good to be true projects.

Over the years kickstarter has become just another big marketing platform for big brands (for their niche) and pushing out smaller projects.

As a former serial backer, over the years I "only" have backed 40 or so (I don't remember the exact number and don't want to check now) and only 2 that failed to deliver. One, in hindsight, is blatantly a scam and kickstarter didn't do anything about it. The other one that didn't deliver is just mismanagement. At least it looked like it. Could still be a scam.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 22 hours ago

I really have no idea, and this would probably be jurisdiction dependent anyway.

They do allow things like food, which it seems would come with more liability anyway, if they can be held liable for kickstarted things.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why would Kickstarter be liable for someone else project.

That’s like trying to sue UberEats for delivering food that gave you food poisoning.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can't really legalese yourself out of being liable if it can be shown you knew of an issue and did nothing to prevent it.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago

Now apply that to politics.