World News

56031 readers

1890 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

437

Palestine Action activists to be sentenced as terrorists without jury’s knowledge (www.middleeasteye.net)

submitted 1 day ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Palestine Action defendants are facing sentencing as terrorists despite being convicted of criminal damage, lifted reporting restrictions reveal.

After reporting restrictions were lifted on Tuesday, Middle East Eye is now able to report for the first time that the court will seek to add a “terrorism connection” to their charges at sentencing - a fact that was kept secret from the jury.

Reporting restrictions also barred media from revealing that the defendants had been prohibited from explaining the motivations for their involvement in the raid to jurors.

Prior to the initial trial, the judge had ruled to remove the defence of lawful excuse on the charge of criminal damage, which meant the activists could not argue that the damage they caused was legally justified to prevent greater crimes being committed by Israel’s military in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But they weren't convicted of terrorism, which has a legal definition. So the judge shouldn't be considering it as an aggravating circumstance since there's no terrorism conviction.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The aggravation is terrorism , not terrorism. They don't have to be convicted of terrorism for the terrorism connection aggravation to apply.

https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/guidelines/offences-with-a-terrorist-connection-guidance/

From what I've read Schedule 1 are terrorism related charges. As you can see terrorist connection aggravation can be applied to crimes covered and not covered by Schedule 1.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

To make this determination the court may hear evidence, and must take account of any representations made by the parties.

This did not happen as far as I can tell. Neither are any of the listed examples applicable.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 16 hours ago

You're saying the activist where not allowed to testify? I doubt that. This covers offenses specified in Schedule 1 and not specified in Schedule 1 so anything can apply.

But most importantly, aggravating is a very concrete thing. Jury doesn't have to know anything about it because it's not a charge. There's a charge that the jury decides upon and aggregating/mitigating circumstances that the judge decides. The central claim of the article, that the activist will be sentenced for some crimes the jury didn't know about is pure manipulation.

I imagine they can fight the verdict in higher court and they can appeal the aggregation and maybe it will be determined that the judge was wrong here but what the article implies is simply a lie.