this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
1116 points (98.7% liked)

me_irl

7749 readers
709 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You'd be stupid to do that, even if you were genuinely trying to be charitable about renting. You'd want some profit for repairs and sudden issues.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Revenue for repairs and sudden issue is still breaking even, the point of profit for landlords is to well generate profit on the bottom line.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

A landlord is almost always making money even if they are just "breaking even" on the mortgage.

If the landlord is still paying for a mortgage, the profit goes into their equity gain.

Once the mortgage is paid off, the profit goes into the landlords pocket.

This is how many people get started being parasites on society. They have other people pay the bank while they gain the assets of their labor.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why the fuck should the price to rent something give profit over the monthly pay of a loan to own it?

Landowners want renters to pay for their stuff. They're lazy leeches.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

See, your foolish mistake is applying morals and logic to the profit drive. There are none to be found, there. Just people who want more money, because they can, and have the law behind their back, threatening you with homelessness and the destruction of your continued existence.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Jokes on my landlord, if I ever lose everything, so does he. 🔥

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Damage to Capital is based.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're insured against your pyrotechnic solutions. Are you? Typically insurance doesn't pay out to the policy holder if they intentionally cause the damage.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well in this scenario, presumably I have "lost everything" and therefore do not care whether the landlord is insured against fire.

He'll burn just the same with or without insurance.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

If you're taking in rent for only the predictable running costs then how are you paying for some sudden issues?