this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
602 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84433 readers
3757 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 81 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Motorola is supposed to be doing Graphene supported phones soon, whether thats from the factory or with an official installer I am not sure

[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Seems likely at this moment that Motorola phones will run GrapheneOS be right out the gate as it is a partnership. Just hopefully it’s not a one sided partnership and Motorola doesn’t strong arm the GrapheneOS people into something that is more locked away and just works like an app. https://www.digitaltrends.com/phones/motorola-plans-to-put-grapheneos-on-phones-so-why-is-it-a-big-deal/

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

From the outside, this doesn't look one sided to me and Motorola (Lenovo) won't want GrapheneOS "locked away".

Motorola partnered with GrapheneOS explicitly because they want the highest security for their enterprise phones (in my opinion), so Motorola demanding GrapheneOS be less secure would be silly for them anyways since they prioritise enterprise (as far as I know).

And in any case, if Motorola caused beef with the GrapheneOS team, I believe in GrapheneOS's morals to ignore stupidity. They probably have a contract anyways that states Motorola have near zero influence over the OS.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Lenovo and Dell are some of the only companies that actually care about Linux weirdly enough. That also arnt Linux software developers anyways. If anyone's goanna do it "right" it's those two.

[–] imdoneinteracting@sh.itjust.works 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sanitation@lemmy.radio 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah but even then - are they targeting hobbyists and privacy crowd? Or more like some special enterprise use case?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Short answer, whoever buys them, all of the above. But consider, that with the whole world's slide to the default invasion of privacy, the privacy crowd might well get invaded by the average Joe tired of all the shit.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It's definitely meant for their Enterprise customers.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Then hopefully M$ Authenticator and banking apps will work on it.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

so, only the most expensive phones not even my small company will afford

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The Moto Signature which is their highest end phone is £900, and a price comparison site can get you an under £40 contract, so the successor should be similar.

[–] kiranraine@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago

I want to applaud that but not if its the same as Google android where you're waiting a year or more for an update. So many features I wanted over the years and was stuck to 11 or 12 at the time(or earlier idk which that thing had but it was a common occurrence since i had the issue with 2 diff phones)