this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
237 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84449 readers
4868 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

1.5 million? That's a rounding error at Google, they'll still try to evade responsibility but that dollar amount is meaningless to them.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 2 points 21 hours ago

Add a handful of zeroes.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's all about setting a precedent.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The precedent that fucking around is going to hurt is what we need set.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately jury trials set no precedent, even if they award damages. So Google can afford to lose because it's almost always a jury trial.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Not a "legal" precedent. But a precedent that they can be sued, and they can lose. Causing more people to sue...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

they could always be sued. the standing of the plaintiffs can (and given the defendant, will) always be challenged. some of it is fundamental rights, some of it's procedural wrangling.

[–] hyperencabulator@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IMO the precedent needs to be a proportion or percentage based item, not an arbitrary number. Something big enough to massively hurt, like 30% of this or last years' post tax profits will be fined and Alphabet and all subsidiaries will be deemed ineligible for any tax waivers, deductions, or credits for a number of years to be determined by a jury, no less than 1 no greater than 100.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Don't think you can get that from a civil suit. But I don't disagree.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 10 points 2 days ago

It’s also probably in CAD so close to just $1 million