this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
195 points (98.5% liked)

Climate

8620 readers
292 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
195
Germany’s climate U-turn is the worst possible response to the oil shock | Prices at the pump have leapt since the start of the conflict – but clinging to fossil fuels will only prolong the pain (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 6 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

there are reactors which can literally use the waste from other reactors

In theory or in practice? If in practice, please name/link them.

Do you have working solutions for carbon emissions?

Until you showed me the reactors that use nuclear waste from other reactors, I call it the bullshit that carbon capture is - greenwashing to continue with the harmful processes.
We need to avoid carbon emissions and nuclear waste. Period.

You are ignorant. Period, end of. I’m tired of hearing ignorant and anti-science people spreading missinfo while pretending to care about science and facts.

Do you know how you sound?
Link to the science or stfu.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I won't do your homework for you mate. If you really want you can look through my profile where I've posted links in the past. It never matters because you always either go silent or just deflect and bury your head in the sand.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, go on claiming stuff while shifting the burden of "homework" on others instead of proving your claims as that sounds like a perfectly scientific approach, lol..
You may be able to fool others with your argument from authority ("science says..."), but please allow me once more to ask you for specific links to your claims.
If you can't/won't provide them I fear it's more like you are the one going silent or burying your head in the sand.
So what's it gonna be?

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stop performimg for an audience, there's no one else here mate. At this point, if you really cared you could have easily found the evidence for what I'm saying. Even in my profile, like I said.

You're a damn fool and I'm not wasting more time. Keep screaming to the void and performing for your audience, I'm ignoring you.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, I'm not screaming, but you're pretty much a void.
If you cared, you could've provided one name or link.
Yeah, I'm gonna ignore you too, because you have nothing to offer but ramblings.