this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
256 points (92.1% liked)

PC Gaming

14602 readers
408 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

FauxLiving, I appreciate your guarantees about the future, but can you demonstrate why the for-profit medical and AI industries wouldn't cut corners if the AI behaved the way you hope it will?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

First, this is a peer-reviewed result not me expressing my hopes.

Second, this application does not replace radiologists. It is a tool for radiologists in one specific type of diagnosis.

If you have some hypothetical future outcome in mind, then the burden of proof is on you to prove your position, not on me to disprove it.

The data shows that this system works.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 23 hours ago

FauxLiving, the burden of proof is on you to show us why your AI utopian vision will happen as you predict it. A paper does not guarantee your fantasy.