this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
316 points (81.9% liked)

/0 Governance

384 readers
33 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: Judging by the comments, a lot of people are obviously not reading the post and are instead assuming we are calling for defederation of lemmy.world. That is not the case, and in fact the opposite is true. LW already temporarily defederated anarchist.nexus once, and the evidence suggests Mr Kaplan is now pushing for full defederation of all the FAF instances. We are trying to build a coalition of instances that will agree to defederate from lemmy.world IF Kaplan goes ahead with the defederation. Apologies if you weren't aware of the context.


🏴‍☠️ Hoist the Black Flag: Pledge to Boycott Lemmy World!

... if Lemmy World dares to defederate from any ship in the Fediverse Anarchist Flotilla - https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/, https://anarchist.nexus/, and https://quokk.au/.


Mateys, we can’t let a mega‑instance captain bully the rest of the fleet just because their ship’s bigger. If Lemmy World tries to throw the FAF overboard, we’re calling for a show of solidarity: a fediverse blockade of Lemmy World in response, until the landlubbers see reason (i.e., there is an acceptable change in their leadership and/or this policy).

This is about mutual aid, not mutiny - standing together so no single admin gets to rule the seas unchallenged. A united armada of smaller instances can absolutely blunt Lemmy World’s outsized influence (and, let’s be honest, their ego).


☠️ A word to the captains: before hoisting colours or locking in a course, we ask ye to let your crew have their say. Run a poll, open the deck for discussion, and listen to the voices aboard your vessel. These seas belong to all of us, and decisions that shape our fediverse should be made together, not from the captain’s quarters alone.

If other captains be keen to chart this course with us, drop anchor and make the pledge public in the comments. The more hands on deck, the harder it is to sink any one of us. Let us know if you are holding a vote!

dbzer0 and AN members can vote on this pledge in !div0_governance@lemmy.dbzer0.com, and quokk.au will be holding their own vote.

🏴‍☠️ Solidarity forever, and fair winds to the Flotilla!

governance type: sense check

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Furbag@pawb.social 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I've been meaning to make a switch to a more niche instance for a while and I couldn't be bothered to motivate myself to do it, so I guess this is as good of an excuse as any. Hello pawb.social.

To be honest, I find the instance tribalism to be a bit cringe and painting entire swathes of users with the same broad brush is just not something I'm interested in taking part in. That being said, I also don't want to be associated with the armpits of the internet either, and when you start catching strays just because you have .world at the end of your username swapping to a more low-key instance is more an act of self-preservation than it is protesting anything about how lemmy.world was run for average users like myself (I posted lots of anti-Israel sentiments on /c/politics and never once got a ban or a warning for that specifically), but I see the benefit in diversifying the fediverse a little bit more.

[–] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

pawb.social is also centralised on Cloudflare.

[–] Furbag@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

[–] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That would depend on who you ask. If you’re asking me, centralised nodes are a bad place to be. It’s like choosing to disproportionately concentrate copious power in the hands of a few. But most users have enough engagement greed to follow the crowd and go where most other people are, in order to get the most views, thus feeding into the network effect.

Cloudflare abuses its power, so I will not feed it.

[–] Furbag@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Cloudflare is where they are hosting, correct?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the issue here, but wouldn't any Lemmy instance with any amount of scale necessarily be centralized to some degree? If not Cloudflare, than some other provider would be the point of contention.

I don't want to let perfect be the enemy of good, so I'm willing to accept some negatives. I think the more important factor is if the instance aligns with my values and the administration team are reasonable, and so far both seem to be true for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)