this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
153 points (98.7% liked)

news

928 readers
647 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s harder cause republicans have the numbers advantage already.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they really dont have a numbers advantage. both partys are just terrible. the difference is republicans do what their base wants. while democrats shit on their base constantly.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but the logistical reason is that Dems do better in large states and Republicans do better in small states. It’s the small states that have the edge for republicans. Also, democratic states tend to be more heavily gerrymandered already, so. So not much gain in gerrymandering more.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

say it with me: 'republicans have the edge in rural states because democrats ignore working class interests and do nothing to support them, republicans at least blame illegals for stealing muh job!'.

the fact is the largest voting group are working class indepedents, and neither party appeals to them.