this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
47 points (92.7% liked)

Firefox

7165 readers
22 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To test drive this I needed to apply some configuration tweaks, but the built-in ad blocker seems to just work. I tried it out on YouTube and a few other sites, and I haven't seen so much as a hitch.

Here's a look at the configuration screen, which currently resides at the top of Settings > Privacy:

AjFP7r2ZeMYur6O.png

Ads from the default search provider are enabled (per their request), but disabling them is pretty straightforward. Other functionality, like toggling the default filter lists (12 are enabled by default) or adding your own are accessible via buttons.

Lists enabled by default:

  • Default
    • EasyList
    • EasyPrivacy
    • uBO Filters
    • uBO quick-fixes
    • uBO unbreak
  • Privacy
    • AdGuard Tracking Protection
    • Peter Lowe's Ad and Tracking Server List
    • uBO Badware
    • uBO Privacy
    • uBO Resource Abuse
  • Annoyances
    • EasyCookie
    • uBO annoyances-cookies

Other available lists:

  • Fanboy's Annoyances
  • Fanboy's Anti-Chat
  • Fanboy's Anti-Newsletter
  • Fanboy's Mobile Notifications
  • Fanboy's Social
  • 34 more Regional lists
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Excuse me, you mean the uBlock Origin fork AdNauseam, which goes a step further and intentionally garbles up advertisers' click data by clicking every ad without loading the resulting content. uBO is old news in light of AN. Don't just take their crap; fight back!

[–] degenerate_neutron_matter@fedia.io 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's an interesting idea, but I'd rather not make any requests at all to the advertisers' servers, even if it's done in the background without me seeing the ads.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

That's the fun thing, it registers "a click" but doesn't actually load the content because that can lead to drive-by and one click malware.

[–] vfye@toast.ooo 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It does give data to advertisers, but the effect is much more dramatic than you might think. For me, it has completely nuked the advertisers' profile of me to the point that the mail I get is obviously affected too. I was getting normal mail before using, but then for a few years I was getting senior citizen related mail and travel brochures, now I am getting coupons relating to pregnancies and personal injury ads. Recently I have been getting texts from realtors asking if I want to sell "my house". Grain of salt is important, I tend to go to random websites, if you have specific interests and regularly and mostly exclusively go to websites related to them, then this scheme would not work. Simply avoiding the ads in the first place would be superior.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

The texts trying to buy your home are just the latest trend in SMS scamming. That is unrelated to AN, for sure.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Tried it, but found it less reliable