this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
298 points (99.3% liked)
Linux
13472 readers
450 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I made SO MANY directories under home that could have just been ~/Projects that I'm annoyed with myself for not doing something so simple.
.... I'll be using the projects directory heavily going forward
I think that's what normal people have been doing for decades.
As someone who has used ~/Projects for years and has syncing and other setup around it I am (very slightly) terrified this change could somehow fuck with me.
Please let this just be a mkdir call that will fail.
I'm on Artix Linux and it did automatically create it after an update.

It likely just runs xdg-user-dirs-update which, in my experience, doesn't delete anything if the folder is already there (the command just changed the folder icon in the file manager when I used to run it on a WM).
I also use a Projects folder. It looks like it probably won't break anything. Apps might start putting stuff there by default, hopefully in sensible subdirectories. There's a note in the article that you can create
~/.config/user-dirs.dirsto specify where you want files to go.Nope. Only makes for new installs, and only uses it as a save spot default if the application asks for it. Should be no change at all.
New installs, or new users? I'd assume the latter?
When I read it originally (a bit back, maybe a week or two ago) it was new installs that was noted, though new users would make sense.
I guess I'll find out soon enough on a test box.
it's excessive for me. I'll continue putting my projects with my documents.