this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
272 points (97.2% liked)

politics

29593 readers
1691 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Removing Trump requires 67 votes in the senate. There is no mathematical way to get those numbers in November. I don't agree with him, but I understand where he is coming from.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter. We need to weaponize impeachment, and impeach him EVERY time he commits another crime. Let there be hundreds, even thousands of impeachment proceedings under way, just for him. And then do the same to all of his henchmen.

It doesn't matter that the Senate won't convict, it still wastes MAGA time. It will still keep them tied up in court with expensive lawyers and publicists, and distract them for every second of the next two years.

MAGA is one of the only groups for which bullying is not only acceptable, but patriotic, and STRONGLY encouraged. They deserve it, so bully them relentlessly until they cry. Abuse the shit out of those psychopaths.

Anti-vaxxers, too.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like this, we definitely should turn their spam like legal strategy of overwhelming the system against them.

This administration has also set the precedent of going after people for purely political reasons. I am not suggesting the Dems do this, but I am suggesting they do as you say and try to prosecute every single crime they can. If it grinds the government to a halt so be it. It is long past time for a recogning of the corruption and embezzlement going on.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

We don't have to go after their politics, although that's what they'll claim, as if they don't do exactly that every day. All we have to do is play HARD BALL, and investigate, charge, prosecute, and issue CONSECUTIVE prison sentences for their criminal violations ONLY.

We don't have to attack them, they'll hang themselves. We just have to force the cowardly Dem leadership to do their jobs. During the Biden administration, all they had to do was invoke the 14th Amendment, and Trump would never have gotten near the White House again, as well as a whole lot of MAGA lawmakers, too.

Time to play Hard Ball. BATTER UP!

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now is the time for a bold declaration of what we're not going to do!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

So courageous.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is a way in the November mid-terms. You're just naysaying for the sake of it. But I understand where you're coming from.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I am a realist. Living in the clouds gets us nowhere. I am not saying we won't get enough seats to put reins on him, but he needs to majorly fuck up to push democrats to to win 20 additional seats. And we are talking fucking up in a way that makes people who have voted for a convicted rapist, pedofile criminal, liar, and overall horrible human being reconsider their vote.

Unfortunately, I don't see it happening.But go ahead, prove me wrong. Canvas, call, influence people. Prove that I am wrong. I want you to. I want you to make me swallow my words. I would love nothing more than to be completely wrong.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Requires the dems winning nearly every race because the maximum they could get up to is 69 right now. If they win every single seat up for re-election.

The dems do have an advantage though. There are more republican seats up for re-election than democrat ones.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Not nearly every race, there are 22 R seats up for grabs and Dems currently have 45. They need every single seat. Some of those republican seats won by more than 20pts last election, also it's not a guarantee that all dems vote for it.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dunno why they keep putting a D after his name.

Dudes R through and through