this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
580 points (99.3% liked)

196

6132 readers
1296 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 33 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I lowkey believe the vast majority of monosexual people are actually bisexual people who have decided for one reason or another they will only date one gender.

[–] verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. Honestly believe that no one is truly entirely hetero or homosexual. I mean, either of those existing is predicated on the existence of a strict gender binary. If gender is a spectrum, sexuality necessarily has to be as well.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wholly agree, it's a spectrum. I'm het, but that's just a shorthand convenience label that says I'm for the most part attracted to people that don't look like me, even if it's not particularly useful or necessarily true, but I don't think it's a bad word if it's helping express something I like.

When I do think it's an awful word is when it's used to restrict someone's freedom in choosing a partner, or forcing someone's view of themselves into a black and white stereotype, so it's a rather loaded word at this point.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's just so simplistic and limiting for there to be words that treat attraction like a fixed trait. I've got to be straight, gay, bi, or some global descriptor for my own behaviour? That sucks.

Like maybe I'm straight, but in a "knows when dudes are hot and comfortable at kink parties" way, you know? There's no word that doesn't lump me in with loads of people I have nothing in common with.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Like maybe I'm straight, but in a "knows when dudes are hot and comfortable at kink parties" way, you know

I'm throwing you in the "fun people" pile, so there's another label ;)

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago

I'm not even fun half the time I'm fuckin SLEEPY

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago

I’m bisexual and pretty open about it… whenever men have had a few drinks around me and I mention it, so many start telling me all the men they are attracted to.

It’s a really funny phenomenon

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Personally and from a pragmatic viewpoint, I don't think it's the vast majority, at least not based on my experience and assuming we're both using the same nonscientific and imprecise definitions.

Having said that, I am fully on board with the idea that more people are somewhere in between on the spectrum of sexuality than most of us realize or recognize, and that far fewer of us are at the extreme ends (i.e. 100% fully hetero, 100% fully homo) than the average person assumes.

At issue here, for me, is recognizing that sexuality is (or can be) extremely complicated. It's a situation where you can be almost comically pedantic and precise, taking things to the absurd, and easily make the claim that nobody is "monosexual". There are so many factors to consider. Peoples' presentation doesn't necessarily correlate to their actual innate orientation. People's sexuality can, and not infrequently, does change over the course of their lifetime. Those are just two examples.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 1 points 4 days ago

I think a big part of my comfort with describing it as a vast majority is because I have an expansive definition. From what I'm given to understand, most people think of a kinsey 1 as het and a kinsey 5 as gay, but those are both clearly bi for me

[–] colin@lemmy.uninsane.org 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the whole "innate v.s. choice" dichotomy is toxic. claim it's a choice, and society will force people to "choose" differently. insist that it's innate and all those people you're alluding to will conclude from their first sexual encounters that they could never choose to enjoy a different type of encounter.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 1 points 5 days ago

It’s certainly more complicated than the dichotomy makes it out to be.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If that is the case, then I've made that decision unknowingly from my own self

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How much time have you spent considering your sexuality, and when did you last consider it? I suspect a lot of people chose a sexuality a long time ago under significant social pressure and don't have a great memory of it because there was kind of a lot going on at the time.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't know if I'm representative at all of the general population, and I swear I'm not trying to be an aha! guy here, but I do ponder this subject every other day or so. Maybe it is my exposure to the online queer/trans spaces, or in part my upbringing (among my parents' friends were many gay couples), but it's frequently on my mind. Is that something you ask yourself ? I do an exercise : I peruse the female form, and I strain to imagine the same individual as a man. Over time I've gotten quite good at this and it challenged my historic view of gender pretty effectively. I dropped thinking of individuals as women or men first, which is how the world was built in my brain from early on (can't say why really). Ultimately, men do nothing for me, carnally speaking. I remember this Woody Allen (?) quote where he said bi folk have twice as much chances to get laid at any given party. I can find any person charming, including men, but that's from an interpersonal point of view, and it doesn't seem to extend to physical attraction. I'm afraid I find the mere thought repulsive.